期刊文献+

胆道探查术后患者生存质量分析 被引量:13

Quality of life for patients after common bile duct exploration
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胆道探查患者手术前后生存质量的变化。方法采用GIQLI生存质量指标评定156例胆道探查手术患者术前及术后2、8、12、16周的生存质量。结果胆道探查患者手术前平均GIQLI指数109.2分,术后2周平均GIQu指数102.5分(P〈0.05),术后8周平均GIQLI指数108.3分(P〉0.05),术后12周平均GIQLI指数116.5分(P〈0.05),术后16周平均GIQLI指数123.5分(P〈0.05)。腹腔镜胆道探查患者(n=69)术后2、8、12周平均GIQLI指数高于开腹胆道手术组(n=87)(分别为106.2±14.1比96.3±11.1,P〈0.05;117.6±12.3比106.7±11.6,P〈0.05;122.1±10.2比115.6±13.8,P〈0.05)。结论胆道手术患者术后短期生存质量下降,与手术创伤、术后留置T管、手术并发症有关;腹腔镜胆道探查手术后较开腹胆道手术后生存质量高。 Objective To evaluate the changes in the quality of life for patients who underwent common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Methods The quality of life of 156 Patients who underwent common bile duct exploration were assessed using the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) before and 2, 8, 12, 16weeks after operation. Results The mean preoperative GIQLI score of the patients was 109.2. The mean postoperative scores were 102.5(P〈0.05), 108.3 (P〉0.05), 116.5 (P〈0.05), and 123. 5 (P〈0.05) at 2, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after operation, respectively. The GIQLI score of the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration group (n= 69) was significantly higher than that of the open common bile duct exploration group (n=87) at 2, 8 andl2 months after operation (P〈0.05) (106.2±14.1 vs 96.3±11.1, P〈0.05; 117.6±12.3 vs 106.7±11.6, P〈0. 05; 122. 122.1±10.2 vs 115.6 ± 13.8, P〈0. 05). Conclusions The quality of life for patients who underwent common bile duct exploration decreased in the early period after operation due to surgery, indwelling T tubes and complications. The quality of life after laparoscopie common bile duct exploration was better than open common bile duct exploration.
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期735-737,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
关键词 生存质量 胆石症 胆道探查 腹腔镜 Quality of life Cholelithiasis Common bile duct exploration Laparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1O'Boyle CA. Assessment of quality of life in Surgery[J]. Br J Surg, 2002,79 : 395-398.
  • 2EyPasch E, Williams Jl, wood-DauPhinee S, et al. Gastroin- testinal quality of life index: development ,validation and appli cation ofa newinstrument[J]. Br J Surg, 1995,82:216-222.
  • 3陈力,戴宁,施小宇,陶思丰,张文瑾.腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除手术对患者生存质量的影响[J].中华外科杂志,2002,40(10):762-765. 被引量:25
  • 4Troidl H,Weehsler AS,MeKneally MF. How to choose a rele- vant enclpoints[J]. In: Troidl H, ed. Surgical research. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 1997 : 303-320.
  • 5Rasanen JV, Niskanen MM, Miettinen P, et al. Health-relat- ed quality of life before and after gastrointestinal surgery[J]. Eur J Surg, 2001,167:419-425.

二级参考文献8

  • 1汤旦林,王松柏.生存质量测定及其在临床试验中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,1994,74(3):175-179. 被引量:86
  • 2Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg, 1995,82: 216-222.
  • 3Troidl H, Kusche J, Vesterweber KH, et al. Pouch versus esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg,1987,11: 699-712.
  • 4Kum CK, Eypasch E, Lefering R, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it relly safe. World J Surg, 1996,20:43-49.
  • 5Troidl H, Wechsler AS, McKneally MF. How to choose a relevant endpoints. In: Troidl H, ed. Surgical research.3rd ed. New York: Springer, 1997.303-320.
  • 6Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, et al. Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg, 1997,84: 610-614.
  • 7陈力,江献川,戴宁,陈根富.肝脏手术对患者生存质量的影响[J].中国实用外科杂志,1997,17(5):268-270. 被引量:11
  • 8陈力,陈聪聪,黄回,郑毅雄,彭淑牖.外科肝癌病人生存质量研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2000,6(6):430-432. 被引量:7

共引文献24

同被引文献78

引证文献13

二级引证文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部