期刊文献+

胆囊良恶性病变组织中ABCG2、SFRP2、BRMS1和HPA的表达及临床病理意义 被引量:5

Expression of ABCG2, SFRP2, BRMS1 and HPA in benign and malignant lesions of the gallbladder and their clinicopathological significances
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究胆囊良恶性病变组织中三磷酸腺苷结合盒转运蛋白G2(ABCG2),分泌型Frizzled相关蛋白2(SFRP2),乳腺癌转移抑制基因1(BRMS1)和乙酰肝素酶(HPA)的表达水平及其临床病理意义。方法将108例胆囊腺癌、46例癌旁组织、15例腺瘤性息肉和35例慢性胆囊炎手术切除标本常规制作石蜡包埋切片,ABCG2、SFRP2、BRMS1和HPA染色方法均为EnVision免疫组化法。结果胆囊腺癌ABCG2和HPA表达阳性率明显高于癌旁组织、腺瘤性息肉和慢性胆囊炎(P〈0.05或P〈0.01);胆囊腺癌SFRP2和BRMS1表达阳性率明显低于癌旁组织、腺瘤性息肉和慢性胆囊炎(P〈0.05或P〈0.01);ABCG2和(或)HPA表达阳性及BRMS1和(或)SFRP2表达阴性的良性病例胆囊上皮均呈中至重度不典型增生。高分化腺癌、无淋巴结转移及未侵犯周围组织器官病例,ABCG2和HPA表达阳性率明显低于低分化腺癌、淋巴结转移及侵犯周围组织器官病例(P〈0.05或P〈0.01),但SFRP2和BRMS1表达则相反(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。经Kaplan—Meier生存分析发现,ABCG2和HPA表达阳性病例术后生存期明显低于阴性表达病例(P=0.017,P=0.016),而SFRP2和BRMS1表达阳性病例术后生存期明显高于阴性表达病例(P=0.019,P=0.008);Cox多变量回归分析显示,ABCG2和(或)HPA阳性表达以及SFRP2和(或)BRMS1阴性表达均为危险因素,是反映胆囊腺癌预后不良的重要指标。结论ABCG2、SFRP2、BRMS1和HPA表达与胆囊腺癌发生、临床生物学行为及预后有密切关系,ABCG2和(或)HPA阳性表达者及SFRP2和(或)BRMS1阴性表达者预后不良。 Objective To study the expression of ABCG2, SFRP2, BRMS1 and HPA and detect their clinicopathological significances in the benign and malignatnt lesions of the gallbladder. Methods EnVisiom immunohistochemical method for determining the expressions of ABCG2, SFRP2, BRMS1 and HPA was used in paraffin-embedded sections of surgical resected specimens from gallbladder adenocarcinoma (n = 108 ), peritumoral tissues ( n = 46 ), adenomatous polyp ( n = 15 ), and chronic cholecystitis ( n = 35 ). Results The positive rates of ABCG2 and HPA expression were significantly higher in gallbladder adenocarcinoma than that in peritumoral tissues, adenomatous polyp and chronic cholecystitis ( P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 O. 01 ) ; The positive rates of SFRP2 and BRMS1 expression were significantly lower in gallbladder adenocarcinoma than that in peritumoral tissues, adenomatous polyp and chronic cholecystitis( P 〈0. 05 or P 〈0. 01 ). The positive cases of ABCG2 and/or HPA as well as negative ones of SFRP2 and/or BRMS1 in the benign lesions showed moderately- or severely-atypical hyperplasia of gallbladder epithelium. The frequency of samples with positive staining for ABCG2 and/or HPA in cases with small tumor volume (diameter 〈 2 cm), no lymph node metastasis, and no invasion into surrounding tissues was significantly lower than that in cases with larger tumor volume (diameter 〉 2 cm), lymph node metastasis, and invasion into surrounding tissues (P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0. 01 ). However, compared with ABCG2 and/or HPA, the expression of SFRP2 and/or BRMS1 showed an opposite correlation in these cases (P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0. 01 ). Unitivariate Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that increased expressions of ABCG2 (P =0. 019) and HPA ( P = 0. 016) or decreased expression of SFRP2 ( P = 0. 019) and BRMS1 ( P = 0. 008 ) were associated with poorer overall survival, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that increased expression of ABCG2(P =0. 018) and HPA (P =0. 019) and/or decreased expression of SFRP2 (P = 0.015) and BRMS1 (P = 0. 011 ) were independently poor-prognostic predictors in gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Conclusions The expression of ABCG2, SFRP2, BRMS1 or HPA might be closely related to the carcinogenesis, clinical biological behaviors, and prognosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期743-746,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 胆囊疾病 免疫组织化学 病理学 临床 预后 Gallbladder diseases Cholecystitis Immunohistochemsitry Pathology, clinical Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Allikmets R, Sehriml LM, Hutehinson A, et al. A hurnan Placenta-specific ATP-binding cassette gene (ABCP) on chromosome 4q22 that is involved in multidrug resistance. Cancer Res, 1998, 58 : 5337-5339.
  • 2Ross DD, Nakanishi T. Impact of breast cancer resistance protein on cancer treatment outcomes. Methods Mol Biol, 2010, 596: 251-290.
  • 3Fong MY, Kakar SS. The role of cancer stem cell and the side population in epithelial ovarian cancer. Histol Histopathol, 2010, 25: 113-120.
  • 4Kawano Y, Kypta R. Secreted antagonists of the Wnt signaling pathway. J Cell Sci, 2003, 116: 2627-2634.
  • 5Yamamura S, Kawakami K, Hirata H, et al. Oncogenic functions of secreted Frizzled-related protein 2 in human renal cancer. Mol Cancer Ther, 2010,9: 1680-1687.
  • 6Chung MT, Lai HC, Sytwu HK, et al. SFRP1 and SFRP2 suppress the transformation and invasion abilities of cervical cancer ceils through Wnt signal pathway. Gynecol Oncol, 2009, 112: 646-653.
  • 7Smith PW, NaseemR, WebbM. Purification and characterization of the breast cancer metastasis suppressor, BRMS1. Protein Expr Purif, 2009, 67: 70-75.
  • 8Phadke PA, Vaidya KS, Nash KT, et al. BRMS1 suppresses breast cancer experimental metastasis to multiple organs by inhibiting several steps of the metastatic process. Am J Pathol, 2008, 172: 809-817.
  • 9Meehan WJ, Welch DR. Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1: update. Clin Exp Metastasis, 2003, 20: 45-50.
  • 10Nadir Y, Brenner B. Heparanase coagulation and cancer progression. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 2009, 22:85-92.

同被引文献71

  • 1余德荣,游力,许晓群,李会庆,王郡甫,高春义.BRMS1 mRNA和CD44V6 mRNA在子宫内膜癌组织中的表达及意义[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(4):287-290. 被引量:16
  • 2姜洁,夏敏,冯进波,孔北华.BRMS1基因抑制卵巢上皮性癌细胞体内外转移的实验研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(6):398-402. 被引量:11
  • 3Okamoto T, Akita N, Kawamoto E, et al. Endothelial connexin32 en- hances angiogenesis by positively regulating tube formation and cell migration[ J ]. Exp Cell Res,2014,321 (2) : 133-141.
  • 4Liu Y, Mayo MW, Naqji, AS, et al. Phosphorylation of RealA/p65 pro- motes DNMT-1 recruitment to chromafin and repress transcription of the tumor metastasis suppresessor gene BRMS1 [ J ]. Oncogene,2012, 31(9) :1143-1154.
  • 5Hurst DR, Welch DR. Unraveling the enigmatic complexities of BRMS1 -mediated metastasis suppression [ J]. FEBS Lett, 2011,585 (20) :3185-3190.
  • 6Kim B, Nam HJ, Pro KE, et al. Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 ( BRMS1 ) is destabilized by the Cul3-SPOP E3 ubiquitin ligase com- plex[ J]. Biochem Biopys Res commun,2011,415 (4) :720-726.
  • 7Yang YL,Chen CZ,Jin LP,et al. Effect and mechansim of the metasta- sis suppressor gene BRMS1 on the migration of breast cancer cells [J]. Int J Clin ExDo Med.2013.6(10) :908-916.
  • 8Suriyan Ponnusamy , Shanmugam Panneer Selvam , Shikhar Mehrotra , et al. Communication between host organism and cancer cells is trans- duced by systemic sphingosine kinase/sphingosine 1-phosphate sig- nalling to regulate turnout metastasis [ J ]. EMBO Mol Med,2012,4 (8) :761-775.
  • 9Sheng X J, Zhou YQ, Song QY, et al. Loss of breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 promotes ovarian cancer cell metastasis by increasing chemokine receptor 4 expression [ J ]. Oncol Rep,2012,27 (4) : 1011- 1018.
  • 10Slipicevic A, Holm R, Emilsen E, et al. Cytoplasmic BRMS1 expres- sion in malignant melanoma is associated with increased diseasefree survival[ J]. BMC cancer,2012,12:73.

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部