期刊文献+

双源CT自适应前瞻性心电门控技术在冠状动脉成像中应用 被引量:3

Application of adapted prospective ECG-gate dual-source CT coronary angiography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估自适应前瞻性心电门控技术在降低双源CT冠状动脉成像辐射剂量中的价值。方法心率<70次/min且心率相对稳定的患者150例,80例(P组)行自适应前瞻性心电门控CT冠状动脉血管成像检查,70例(R组)行回顾性心电门控CT冠状动脉血管成像检查,比较2组图像质量和辐射剂量。结果 P组和R组有效辐射剂量分别为(3.35±0.89)mSv和(10.21±3.61)mSv,差异有统计学意义(t=16.442,P=0.000)。2组图像质量比较差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.029,P=0.304)。结论对心率<70次/min且心率相对稳定的患者运用自适应前瞻性心电门控技术,可降低双源CT冠状动脉血管成像的辐射剂量,且图像质量不受影响。 Objective To evaluate the value of adapted prospective ECG-gate on reducing radiation dose of dual-source CT coronary angiography.Methods In 150 patients with stable heart rate70 beats per minute,80 underwent adapted prospective ECG-gate dual-source CT coronary angiography(group P) and 70 received retrospective ECG-gate dual-source CT coronary angiography(group R),respectively.The image quality and radiation dose were compared between two groups.Results The radiation doses of group P and group R were(3.35±0.89)mSv and(10.21±3.61)mSv respectively,which showed a significant difference between two groups(t=16.442,P=0.000).There was no significant difference in image quality between two groups(Z=-1.029,P=0.304).Conclusion For patients with stable heart rate70 beats per minute,the radiation dose can be reduced obviously in CT coronary angiography using adapted prospective ECG-gate technique and preserve good image quality.
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2011年第9期878-881,共4页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
关键词 体层摄影术 冠状动脉 X线计算机 辐射剂量 Computed tomography coronary artery X-ray radiation dose
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

共引文献175

同被引文献30

  • 1Brooks RA. A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning[J]. Comput Assist Tomogr, 1977,1 (4) : 487-493.
  • 2Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience[J]. Eur Radio1,2007,17(6) :1510-1517.
  • 3Kang MJ, Park CM, Lee CH, et al. Focal iodine defects on color-coded iodine perfusion maps of dual-energy pulmonary CT angiography images: a potential diagnostic pitfall[J]. AJR, 2010,195(5) :W325-330.
  • 4Singh S, Alra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques [ J ]. Radiology, 2010, 257 ( 2 ) : 373- 383.
  • 5Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U, et al. Coronary stent asscssability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2007,69(7) :933-938.
  • 6Tanami Y, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, et al. Improvement of in- stent lumen measurement accuracy with new high-definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012,28 (2) : 337-342.
  • 7Ethan J, Halpern MD, David J, et al. Is coronary stent assessment improve with spectral analysis of dual energy CT? [J]. Acad Radiol, 2009,16 (10): 1241-1250.
  • 8Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, et ak Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective dose at multidetector row CT and electron-beam CTr-J]. Radiology,2008,226(1):19- 23.
  • 9Dill T, Deetjen A, Ekinci O, et al. Radiation dose exposure in multi-slice computed tomography of the coronaries in comparison with conventional coronary angiography[J]. Int J Cardiol,2008, 124:307-311.
  • 10Hsich J, Londt J, Vass M, et al. Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac X ray computed Iomography[J]. Med Phys,2006,33(11) :4236-4218.

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部