期刊文献+

大学教育目标如何在学生评教中得到体现--以24所世界著名大学为例 被引量:24

The Conformance between Goals of Education and Student Course Ratings:Based on an Empirical Analysis of 24 World-class Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学生评教是国内外大学普遍采用的改善教育质量的手段。本文在"终结型"——"发展型"教育目标的理论框架下,整理并考察世界一流大学的学生评教指标,实证分析评教指标背后所体现的大学教育目标及模式。研究发现,国外大学的学生评教与教育目标之间具有一贯性,其指标设计同时融合了"终结型"和"发展型"取向的评教内容,后者略占优势;在地区差异上,欧洲大学偏向于"发展型"的教学目标,而亚太大学中"终结型"模式仍然表现强势。分析结果也提示我们,应更深入地理解国外大学评教指标,促进学生评教与教育目标的整合性,推动先进教学模式的形成,从而提高我国大学学生评教的有效性。 The student course ratings(SCR) are a widely employed device for evaluating teaching quality both in Chinese universities and their overseas counterparts.The fundamental assumption in this study is that a valid SCR should be consistent with its educational goals.Educational goals are categorized into two types,namely "Attainment Model" and "Development Model" based on different definitions of teaching success,treatment toward teaching contents,teachers' role,students' status,teacher-student relationship,etc.The purpose of this study is to identify through empirical analysis whether the items in SCRs conform to the educational goals and how the underlying educational conceptions vary among overseas universities across different regions.As a result of examining 461 rating questions of 24 universities,it is found that the questions selected are in conformity with educational goals,and European universities are more inclined to adopt the development model while their Asia-Pacific counterparts adhere to the attainment model.
机构地区 复旦大学
出处 《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期18-22,44,共6页 Fudan Education Forum
关键词 学生评教 教育目标 终结型 发展型 Student Course Ratings Educational Goal Attainment Model Development Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Marsh H. W.Students" evaluations of university teaching: research findings,methodological issues and directions for future research[J]. International Journal of Educational Research,1987,11:253-388.
  • 2Centra J.Reflective faculty evaluation[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1994.
  • 3Neath I.How to improve your teaching evaluations without improving your teaching[J].Psychological Reports,1996,78:1363-1372.
  • 4Sproule R. The underdetermination of instructor performance by data from the student evaluation of teaching[J].Economics of Education Review,2002,21:287-294.
  • 5Pearse H.Brother can you spare a paradigm? The theory beneath the practice[J].Studies in Art Education,1983,24:158-163.
  • 6Koliteh & Dean.Student ratings of instruction in the USA:hidden assumptions and missing conceptions about "good" teaching[J].Studies in Higher Education,1999,24:1.
  • 7Kember & Gow.Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning[J],Joumal of Higher Education,1994,65:58-74.
  • 8Barr R. & Tagg J.From teaching to learning-a new paradigm for undergraduate education[J]. Change,1995:13-24.
  • 9Edith Braun & Bernhard Leidner.Academic Course Evaluation: Theoretical and Empirical Distinctions Between Self-Rated Gain in Competences and Satisfaction with Teaching Behavior[J]. European Psychologis,2009,14(4) :297-306.
  • 10串本刚.教育目的との对応にみる教育评价の妥当性[J].大学教育学会志.2005,27(1):127.

同被引文献155

引证文献24

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部