期刊文献+

骨髓间充质干细胞对大鼠梗死心肌胶原重构的双重调节作用 被引量:4

Dural modulation effects of mesenchymal stem cells implantation on myocardial collagen remodeling in a rat model of myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨骨髓间充质干细胞(MSC)对梗死心肌胶原重构的调节作用。方法采用结扎冠状动脉前降支的方法复制大鼠心肌梗死(MI)模型,随机分为假手术组(仅穿线不结扎冠状动脉,n=8)、MI+PBS组(结扎冠状动脉+心肌注射PBS溶液,n=8)和MI+MSC组(结扎冠状动脉+心肌注射MSC,n=8)。通过心脏超声检查、血液动力学检查和组织学染色方法分别检测左心室射血分数(LVEF)、短轴缩短率(Fs)、左心室收缩末压力(LVSP)、左心室舒张末压力(LVEDP)、左心室压最大升降速率(±dp/dtmax)、心肌梗死面积和梗死扩张指数等指标,评价MSC对大鼠心功能及心室重构的影响。同时采用免疫组化、RT—PCR、Westernblot等方法,测量胶原蛋白表达情况。结果(1)MI大鼠心室重构和心脏功能指标的检测结果:MI+MSC组大鼠心肌梗死面积显著小于MI+PBS组[(38.27±2.70)%比(46.20±3.17)%,t=5.386,P〈0.001],Fs显著高于MI+PBS组[(29.98±4.50)%比(23.43±3.34)%,t=-3.305,P:0.005],LVSP显著高于MI+PBS组[(113.63±10.81)mmHg(1mmHg:0.133kPa)比(99.254-16.76)mmHg,P〈0.05],LVEDP显著低于MI+PBS组[(12.10±4.28)mmHg比(20.08±4.26)mmHg,P〈0.05],+dp/dtmax显著高于MI+PBS组[(4616.63±363.34)mmHg/s比(3912.75±248.79)lTlml-Ig/s,P〈0.05],-dp/dtmax显著高于MI+PBS组[(4254.63±324.34)mmHg/s比(3530.88±309.71)mmHg/s,P〈0.05]。(2)I型和Ⅲ型胶原蛋白表达水平的检测结果:MI+MSC组大鼠梗死区I型和Ⅲ型胶原蛋白表达均显著高于MI+PBS组,而非梗死区I型和Ⅲ型胶原蛋白表达均显著低于MI+PBS组(P均〈0.05)。结论MSC通过促进MI大鼠梗死区胶原蛋白修复性合成,减少非梗死区胶原蛋白沉积,从而抑制心室重构,改善心脏功能。 Objective To investigate the modulation effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) implantation on the collagen remodeling in myocardial infarction. Methods Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was induced in SD rats by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation, and the animals were assigned randomly into the Sham group, MI + PBS group and MI + MSCs group. Echocardiography and hemodynamic examinations were performed to evaluate the cardiac function. HE staining and Masson trichrome staining were used to evaluate the myocardial infarction size. Infarcted area and infarcted expansion index were calculated. The expression of collagens in infarcted hearts was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR and Western blot. Results (1) Infarct area was significantly reduced post MSCs transplantation [ MI + MSCs vs. MI + PBS: (38. 27 ± 2.70) % vs. (46.20 ± 3.17) %, P 〈 0. 001 ]. (2) Cardiac function was significantly improved post MSCs transplantation [ MI + MSCs vs. MI +PBS: FS (%) : 29. 98 ± 4. 50 vs. 23.43±3.34, P = 0. 005 ; LVSP ( mm Hg, 1 mm Hg = 0. 133 kPa) : 113.63± 10.81vs. 99. 25±16.76, P〈0.05; LVEDP(mm Hg)- 12.10 ±4.28 vs. 20. 08 ±4.26, P〈0.05; + dp/dtmax(mm Hg/s) : 4616. 63 ±363.34 vs. 3912. 75 ±248. 79, P〈0. 05; - dp/dtmax (ram Hg/s) : 4254. 63±324. 34 vs. 3530. 88 ±309. 71, P 〈0. 05]. (3) Collagen synthesis was enhanced in infarcted area and decreased in non-infarcted area post MSCs transplantation ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions MSCs transplantation could enhance the collagen synthesis in infarcted area while decrease the deposition of collagen in non-infarcted area in this MI model. This may be one of the mechanisms by which ventricular remodeling is attenuated post MSCs transplantation.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期840-846,共7页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30871053)
关键词 心肌梗死 间质干细胞 心室重构 胶原 Myocardial infarction Mesenchymal stem cells Ventricular remodeling Collagen
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Orlic D,Kajstura J,Chimenti S,et al.Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart,improving function and survival.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2001,98:10344-10349.
  • 2Du YY, Zhou SH, Zhou T, et al. Immuno-inflammatory regulation effect of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in a rat model of myocardial infarction.Cytotherapy,2008,10:469-478.
  • 3Guo J,Lin GS,Bao CY,et al. Anti-inflammation role for mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in myocardial infarction.Inflammation,2007,30:97-104.
  • 4Xu X,Xu Z,Xu Y,et al.Effects of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on extracellular matrix after myocardial infarction in rats.Coron Artery Dis,2005,16:245-255.
  • 5张春瑜,孙爱军,葛均波,张书宁,王克强,邹云增.自体骨髓干细胞移植治疗慢性缺血性心脏病患者的有效性[J].中华心血管病杂志,2010,38(7):656-661. 被引量:6
  • 6Ertl G,Frantz S.Healing after myocardial infarction.Cardiovasc Res,2005,66:22-32.
  • 7Wilansky S,Moreno CA,Lester SJ.Complications of myocardial infarction.Crit Care Med,2007,35(8Suppl):S348-S354.
  • 8van AM J,Bou-Gharios G,Popa E,et al.Bone marrow-derived myoflbroblasts contribute functionally to scar formation after myocardial infarction.J Pathol,2008,214:377-386.
  • 9Jugdutt BI. Ventricular remodeling after infarction and the extracellular collagen matrix:when is enough enough? Circulation,2003,108:1395-1403.
  • 10林楚伟,周胜华,刘启明,杜优优,姚丽群,张良,柴湘平.骨髓间充质干细胞诱导心脏成纤维细胞向肌纤维母细胞转化:不同时期心肌梗死区域的最佳微环境[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(36):6667-6671. 被引量:5

二级参考文献42

  • 1中华人民共和国科学技术部.关于善待实验动物的指导性意见.2006.09-30
  • 2Lipinski MJ,Biondi-Zoccai GG,Abbate A,et al.Impact of intracoronary cell therapy on left ventricular function in the setting of acute myocardial infarction; a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:1761-1767.
  • 3Martin-Rendon E,Brunskill SJ,Hyde CJ,et al.Autologous bone marrow stem cells to treat acute myocardial infarction:a systematic review.Eur Heart J,2008,29:1807-1818.
  • 4Zhang SN,Sun AJ,Ge JB,et al.Intracoronary autologous bone marrow stem cells transfer for patients with acute myocardial infarction:a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Int J Cardiol,2009,136:178-185.
  • 5Assmus B,Honold J,Schachinger V,et al.Transcoronary transplantation of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,2006,355:1222-1232.
  • 6Yao K,Huang R,Qian J,et al.Administration of intracoronary bone marrow mononuclear cells on chronic myocardial infarction improves diastolic function.Heart,2008,94:1147-1153.
  • 7Zhao Q,Sun Y,Xia L,et al.Randomized study of mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in patients with coronary surgery.Ann Thorac Surg,2008,86:1833-1840.
  • 8Moher D,Cook DJ,Eastwood S,et al.Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials; the QUOROM statement.Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.Lancet,1999,354:1896-1900.
  • 9Higgins JP,Thompson SG.Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis.Stat Med,2002,21:1539-1558.
  • 10Ang KL,Chin D,Leyva F,et al.Randomized,controlled trial of intramuscular or intracoronary injection of autologous bone marrow cells into scarred myocardium during CABG versus CABG alone.Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med,2008,5:663-670.

共引文献9

同被引文献29

  • 1See F, Kompa A, Martin J, et al. Fibrosis as a therapeutic target post-myocardial infarction. Current pharmaceutical design, 2005, 11:477-487.
  • 2Ertl G, Frantz S. Healing after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res, 2005,66:22-32.
  • 3Daskalopoulos EP, Janssen BJ, Blankesteijn WM. Myofibroblasts in the infarct area: Concepts and challenges. Microsc MicroanaI, 2012,18:35-49.
  • 4Du YY, Zhou SH, Zhou T, et al. Immuno-inflammatory regulation effect of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Cytotherapy ,2008,10:469-478.
  • 5Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, et al. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001,98:10344-10349.
  • 6Trueblood NA, Xie Z, Communal C, et al. Exaggerated left ventricular dilation and reduced collagen deposition after myocardial infarction in mice lacking osteopontin. Circ Res, 2001,88 : 1080-1087.
  • 7Calderone A, Bel-Hadj S, Drapeau J, et al. Scar myofibroblasts of the infarcted rat heart express natriuretic peptides. J Cell Physiol, 2006,207 : 165-173.
  • 8Gabbiani G, Hirschel B J, Ryan GB, et al. Granulation tissue as a contractile organ. A study of structure and function. J Exp Med, 1972,135:719-734.
  • 9van Amerongen M J, Bou-Gharios G, Popa E, et al. Bone marrow- derived myofibroblasts contribute functionally to scar formation after myocardial infarction. J Pathol, 2008,214:377-386.
  • 10Mollmann H, Nef HM, Kostin S, et al. Bone marrow-derived cells contribute to infarct remodelling. Cardiovasc Res, 2006,71 : 661- 671.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部