期刊文献+

经腹解剖路径根治性肾切除术60例临床分析

Anatomical path of intraperitoneal radical nephrectomy: clinical experience of 60 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腹解剖路径根治性肾切除术的安全性及有效性。方法回顾性分析2007年3月至2009年12月郑州人民医院60例T2N0M0至T3N0M0期,经腹解剖路径根治性。肾切除术的手术过程及临床资料,统计分析手术时间、估计失血量、下床活动时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、止痛剂用量、引流量、引流管拔除时间、并发症发生率、术后住院日等。结果60例手术全部成功,无严重并发症及输血者,手术时间(106±23)min,估计失血量(112±37)ml;恢复饮食时间(2.1±0.7)d、下床活动时间(1.9±1.1)d,哌替啶用量(65±25)mg,引流量中位值100(50—300)ml,引流管拔除时间(3.6±1.3)d,术后平均住院日(9.4±2.1)d。结论经腹解路径根治性肾切除术具有解剖层次清晰、手术时间短、出血少、损伤少、术后恢复快、并发症发生率低等优点。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal anatomical radical nephrectomy (IARN). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 60 consecutive patients undergoing IARN at our hospital from March 2007 to December 2009. Various clinical parameters were collected and analyzed statistically. Results Sixty operations were performed successfully. There was neither conversion into open surgery nor blood transfusion. The mean operative time was (106 ± 23) rain, mean intraoperative estimated blood loss ( 112 ±37) ml, mean time of resuming oral intake (2. 1 ±0.7) d, mean time to ambulation ( 1.9 ± 1.1 ) d, mean postoperative analgesics ( pethidine ) dosage ( 65 ± 25 ) mg, average drainage volume 100(50 -300)ml, mean time of extracting drainage tube (3.6± 1.3 )d and mean postoperative hospital stay (9.4 ± 2. 1 ) d. Conclusion IARN offers the advantages of distinct anatomical level, shorter operative time, less hemorrhage, less damage, faster postoperative recovery and a lower rate of complications.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第34期2427-2429,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 肾肿瘤 肾切除术 解剖学 Kidney neoplasms Nephrectomy Anatomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1马建辉.肾细胞癌诊断治疗指南.见:那彦群,孙光.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1-15.
  • 2Robson CJ. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 1963, 89: 37-42.
  • 3Rosoff JS, Raman JD, Sosa RE, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal masses 7 centimeters or larger. JSLS ,2009 , 13:148-153.
  • 4陈晓峰,周芳坚,韩辉,秦自科,刘卓炜,余绍龙,李永红,侯国良.肾癌根治术166例经验总结[J].癌症进展,2007,5(2):122-126. 被引量:5
  • 5Mitchell RE, Lee BT, Cookson MS, et al. Radical nephrectomy surgical outcomes in the University HealthSystem Consortium Data Base: Impact of hospital case volume, hospital size, and geographic location on 40,000 patients. Cancer, 2009 , 115 : 2447-2452.

二级参考文献17

  • 1李晓飞,周芳坚,丘少鹏,刘卓炜,吴荣佩,黄凯,梅骅.肾癌腔静脉癌栓的诊断与治疗[J].癌症,2004,23(9):1074-1076. 被引量:19
  • 2[16]Babu SC,Mianoni T,Shah PM,et al.Malignant renal tumor with extension to the inferior vena cava.Am J Surg,1998,176 (2):137
  • 3[17]Swierzewski DJ,Swierzewski MJ,Libertino JA.Radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma with venous,vena caval,and atrial extension.Am J Surg,1994,168 (2):205
  • 4[18]Neves RJ,Zincke H,Taylor WF.Metastatic renal cell cancer and radical nephrectomy:Identification of prognostic factors and patient survival.J Urol,1988,139 (6):1173
  • 5[19]Skinner DG,Colvin RB,Vermillion CD,et al.Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma.A clinical and pathologic study of 309 cases.Cancer,1971,28 (5):1165
  • 6[2]Robson CJ.Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.J Urol,1963,89:37
  • 7[4]Krane RJ.Radical nephrectomy.In:Hamdy FC,ed.Management of urologic malignanies.China:RDG Group limited,2002:298
  • 8[5]Wright MPJ.Ritchie AWS.Radical nephretomy.In:Belldegrum A,et al.Renal & adrenal tumors.Italy:Legoprint S.P.A,2003:280
  • 9[6]Swanson DA,Borges PM.Complications of transabdominal radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.J Urol,1983,129 (4):704
  • 10[7]Corman JM,Penson DF,Hur K,et al.Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy:Results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program.BJU Int,2000,86 (7):782

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部