期刊文献+

X线平片对脊椎骨折患者诊断价值的研究 被引量:9

The diagnostic value of X-ray for spinal fracture patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨X线平片对脊椎骨折患者诊断价值。方法:60例临床CT诊断为脊椎压缩性骨折的患者采用X线平片进行再次观察,主要分析不同损伤程度的脊椎骨折患者诊断征象与评分。结果:X线平片诊断48例,诊断成功率为80.0%。漏诊12例,漏诊率20.0%。轻度组脊椎骨折X线与CT检查的评分结果显示[(6.82±1.32)分vs(7.82±1.92)分],不同检查之间评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而中度组[(8.26±1.01)分vs(11.32±1.26)分]与重度组[(8.36±1.62)分vs(12.36±1.06)分]的不同检查之间评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:X线平片对脊椎骨折诊断价值比较高,尤其使对椎体压缩和椎体旋转脱位的诊断效果,但是损伤程度的关联性还存在不足,因此对损伤程度不同的患者,还需要加强联合诊断。 Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of X-ray for spinal fracture patients.Methods: 60 patients diagnosed as spinal compression fracture by CT were examined again by X-ray.The diagnosis signs and scores of spinal fracture patients of different severity were analyzed.Results: 48 patients were diagnosed with X-ray.The successful diagnosis rate was 80.0%.12 patients were missed,and misdiagnosis rate was 20.0%.The diagnosis scores in the mild group were [(6.82±1.32) scores vs(7.82±1.92) scores] respectively for X-ray diagnosis and CT examination,there was no significant differences between the two diagnosis methods(P〉0.05).However,there were significant differences between X-ray diagnosis and CT examinations in the moderate [(8.26±1.01) scores vs(11.32±1.26) scores] and severe group [(8.36±1.62) scores vs(12.36±1.06) scores](all P〈0.05).Conclusion: X-ray diagnosis shows good diagnostic values for spinal fracture,but its correlation with different injury severity is not satisfactory enough.Thus to reduce unnecessary examinations,different examination methods should be chosen for patients of different severity according to clinical symptoms.
作者 汤鹏
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2011年第28期159-160,共2页 China Medical Herald
关键词 脊椎骨折 X线平片 损伤程度 关联性 Spinal fracture X-ray examination Injury severity Correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献13

  • 1戴书华,申斌.脊柱爆裂型骨折的平片与CT对比研究[J].第三军医大学学报,1996,18(2):157-159. 被引量:6
  • 2Kim NH, Lee HM, Chun IM, et al. Neurologic Injury and Recovery in Patients with Burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine,1999, 24 (3): 290
  • 3Vaccaro AR, Nachwalter RS, Klein GR, et al. The significance of thoracolumbar spinal canal size in spinal cord injury patients. Spine,2001, 26 (4): 371
  • 4Fontijine WPJ, De Klerk LWL, Breakman R. CT scan prediction of neurological deficit in thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1992, 74 (5): 683
  • 5Limb D, Shaw DL, Dickson RA. Neurological injury in thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1995, 77 (5): 774
  • 6Dendrinos GK, Halikias JG, Krallis PN, et al. Factors influencing neurological recovery in burst thoracolumbar fractures. Acta Orthop Belg, 1995, 61 (3): 226
  • 7Oner F C,Ramos L M,Simmermacher R K,et al.Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures:problems of reproducibility.A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI[J].Eur Spine J,2002,11(3):235-245.
  • 8Holmes J F,Mirvis S E,Panacek A E,et al.Variability in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spine injuries [J].J Trauma,2002,53(3):524-529.
  • 9Kanchiku T,Taguchi T,Kawai S.Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis and new classification of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture [J].J Orthop Sci,2003,8(4):463-466.
  • 10施庭芳.脊椎压缩性骨折的影像学诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,1999,33(1):63-66. 被引量:54

共引文献59

同被引文献40

引证文献9

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部