期刊文献+

h指数在学科专业研究水平评价上的应用——以植物病理专业国内发表文献为例 被引量:5

The Application of h-index to Research Level Evaluation of Discipline Speciality——Based on National Literature Analysis in Phytonology
原文传递
导出
摘要 由Hirsch提出的h指数是评价研究人员科研产出的新指标,也可应用于高校学术水平评价。以CNKI为数据源,以《中国科学引文数据库》2001-2010年间收录的关于植物病理的论文为样本,测算高校及各科研院所在植物病理专业研究水平的h指数,并运用h指数审视中国病理专业科研机构科研水平以及论文的质量和重要程度、创新性、实用性,体现其学术影响力。 Hirsch puts forward a new indicator named h-index for evaluating scientist performance which is expanded and applicated to appraisal of academic standards. By means of Bibliometric, based on national literature analysis results of papers in Phytonology that collected from the "Full Text Database of CNKI" during 2001 to 2010, the h-index of the plant pathology research institutions is estimated and the application of research level of discipline speciality is evaluated, to examine their academic standard and influence by quality or extent of papers' importance, practice and innovatiion.
作者 吴景芝
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第20期28-31,110,共5页 Library and Information Service
关键词 H指数 学术评价 文献计量学 植物病理 h-index academic evaluation Bibliometric Phytonology(plant pathology)
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1周志峰,万荣根,俞树文.h指数视角的高校学术水平分析[J].情报杂志,2010,29(3):71-74. 被引量:25
  • 2Hirsch J. An index to quantify an individual' s scientific research output. [ 2010 -07 -07 ]. http://www, ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/prnc/ articles/pmc1283832/.
  • 3Glnzel W. On the h-index-a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 2006,67(2) :315 -321.
  • 4Ronald Rousseau,刘俊婉(翻译),马建华(审校).Hirsch指数研究的新进展[J].科学观察,2006,1(4):23-25. 被引量:80
  • 5Vanclay J. On The robustness of the h-index. [ 2010 -06 -06 ]. http ://arxiv. org/abs/es/0701074.
  • 6Rousseau R. The influence of missing publications on the hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics,2007,1 ( 1 ) :2 -7.
  • 7Olden J D. How do ecological journals stack-up? Ranking of scientific quality according to the h-index. Ecoscience,2007,14 ( 3 ) :370 - 376.
  • 8Braun T, Glanzel W. A hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics,2006,69( 1 ) 169 - 173.
  • 9Raan A V. Comparison of the hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics ,2006,67 ( 3 ) :491 - 502.
  • 10Mugnaini R, Packer A L, Meneghini R. Comparison of scientists of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA on the basis of the h-index. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research,2008,2(41 ) :258 -262.

二级参考文献98

共引文献316

同被引文献124

  • 1余峰.科研管理的得力助手——《科学引文索引》[J].图书馆论坛,1993,13(1):56-57. 被引量:3
  • 2文庭孝,邱均平.科学评价中的计量学理论及其关系研究[J].情报理论与实践,2006,29(6):650-656. 被引量:22
  • 3万锦堃,花平寰,赵呈刚.中国部分重点大学h指数的探讨[J].科学观察,2007,2(3):9-16. 被引量:84
  • 4CNKI中国引文数据库[DB/OL].http://ref.cnki.net/refnavigator.aspx.
  • 5国家示范性高等职业院校[DB/OL].http.//baike.baidu.eral/view/2284367.htm.2012-01-14.
  • 6Morel CM, Serruya SJ, Penna GO, et al. Co-authorship network analysis : a powerful tool for strategic planning of research, develop-ment and capacity building programs on neglected diseases [J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2009, 3(8) : eS01.
  • 7Wang LD, Chen HG, Guo JG, et al. A strategy to control transmis- sion of Schistosoma japonicum in China [J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(2) : 121-144.
  • 8Zhou Y, Zheng HJ, Chen YY, et al. The Schistosomajaponicum ge- nome reveals features of host-parasite interplay [J]. Nature, 2009, 460(7253) : 345-356.
  • 9Hu W, Yan Q, Shen DK, et al. Evolutionary and biomedical impli- cations of a Schistosoma japonicum complementary DNA resource[J]. Nat Genet, 2003, 35(2) : 139-147.
  • 10郑佳之,张杰.一种个人学术影响力的评价方法[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(6):957-960. 被引量:13

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部