期刊文献+

试论转喻的指示功能 被引量:7

Towards the Indexical Function of Metonymy
原文传递
导出
摘要 对转喻的研究涉及转喻和隐喻的辨证关系、与转喻有关的认知域、概念映射的特征、转喻操作的认知层次等方面。然而转喻覆盖的认知域之间的界限并非泾渭分明,转喻的认知操作层面并非像想象中的那么简明和单一。本文认为从符号学的角度对转喻的生成和理解过程进行分析,佐以对认知语境的正确感悟,可以在其他人的研究基础上,进一步认识转喻和隐喻在不同认知层面上的运行状况以及转喻在指示认知平面上的语义和语用功能。 Metonymy should be analyzed from the perspectives of dialectical relationships between metonymy and metaphor, adumbrations of metonymic cognitive domains, context-driven conceptual mappings ,multi-cognitive levels of metonymic operations, etc. However, the demarcation line between metonymy related cog-domains is not always as clear-cut as usually expected and the cog-levels for metonymic operations are more complicated than previously conceived. A semiotic approach plus some proper understanding of cog-context would help to differentiate metonymy and metaphor at different cog-levels with a clearer depiction of some semantic and pragmatic functions of metonymy at the indexical level.
作者 熊学亮
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期1-4,8,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 转喻 认知域 映射 认知层面 符号学 metonymy cog-domain mapping cog-level semiotics
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Dirven, R. 1993. Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strate- gies of conceptualization [ J ]. Leuvense Bijdragen, ( 82 ) : 1 - 28.
  • 2Fauconnier,G, & M, Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind' s Hidden Complexities [M ]. New York: Basic Books.
  • 3Haser, V. 2005. Metaphor, Metonymy , and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics[ M]. Berlin :Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 4Lakoff,G. & M, Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason : A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor[M]. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  • 5Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [ M ]. Chica- go : University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Langacker, R. 1993. Reference-point constructions E J]. Cognitive Linguistics,4 ( 1 ) : 1 - 38.
  • 7Langacker, R. 2000. Grammar and Conceptualization [ M ]. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 8Lu lunyu. 2008. A prototypicality analysis of metonymy [ Z ]. Manu- script.
  • 9Mendoza, R. 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understand- ing metonymy [ A]. In Antonio,B. ( ed. ). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective [ C ]. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 10Panther, K. & L. Thomburg. 2003. Metonymy and Pragmatic Infer- encing [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

同被引文献55

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部