期刊文献+

弱势群体保护的社会契约基础 被引量:8

The Social Contract Base of Protection to the Disadvantaged Groups
原文传递
导出
摘要 根据订约语境的不同以及契约传统和价值取向的不同,社会契约可分为同意型社会契约、互惠型社会契约、平等型社会契约和人本型社会契约。社会契约视域下的弱势群体可相应界定为:没有实际参与同意过程而使缔约目的没有充分实现的人群;没有从社会契约中受惠并与契约伙伴同步发展的人群;没有在立约时被平等对待并予倾斜保护致其基本人权受到侵害的人群;没有在契约重大变更时处于有利地位而被作为功利考量牺牲品的人群。弱势群体保护的社会契约责任基础包括:同意型社会契约政府责任之自由基础、互惠型社会契约个人责任之功利基础、平等型社会契约社会责任之正义基础、人本型社会契约动态完善之人道基础。 Acording to the difference of contracting context, contract tradition and value, social contracts can be classified as following: Social contract of the type of agreement; Social contract of the type of reciprocity; Social contract of the type of equality; Social contract of the type of human-priority. From the viewpoint of social contract, the disadvantaged groups can be defined as: the groups not practically participating the agreement process which leads to the failure of achieving the contracting objectives fully; the groups not benefiting from the social contract and not develop together with their contract partners ; the groups not being equally treated in the conclusion of the social contract and whose basic human rights suffered infringement ; the groups not being in the advantageous position in the important alteration of the social contract and being taken into account as utility sacrificial lamb. The base of social contract liability of the protection to the disadvantaged groups concludes: The governmental liability to protect the disadvantaged groups is based on individual liberty; The individual liability to protect the disadvantaged groups is based on social utility; The social liability to protect the disadvantaged groups is based on social justice; The dynamic perfection of social contiact is based on humanitarian concern .
作者 赵迅
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第11期2-13,共12页 Hebei Law Science
基金 国家社科基金项目<社会弱势群体保护的理论基础及应用研究>(10BFX005) 湖南省社科基金项目<弱势群体保护的社会契约基础> 湘哲社领[2009]15号(09YBA033) 受湖南大学<中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金>项目资助
关键词 弱势群体保护 社会契约类型 社会契约视域下的弱势群体 社会契约基础 protection to the disadvantaged groups social contract type the disadvantaged groups from the viewpoint of social contract social contract base
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1于立深.契约方法论--以公法哲学为背景的思考[M].北京大学出版社,2007.121,122-123.
  • 2[英]戴维·包彻,保罗·凯利.社会契约论及其批判者[A].[英]迈克尔·莱斯诺夫,等.刘训利,等译.社会契约论[M].江苏人民出版社.2005.402,403,408,420.
  • 3J · W · Gough. JohnLocke' s Political Philosophy( Second Edition) [ M ]. Oxford University Press, 1973, pp. 52 - 79.
  • 4[加]威尔·吉姆利.社会契约论传统[A].[英]迈克尔·莱斯诺夫,等,刘训练,等译.社会契约论[M].江苏人民出版社,2005.391-392,385,386,391,389-390.
  • 5[英]迈克尔·莱斯诺夫等,刘训利,等译.社会契约论[M].江苏人民出版社,2005.422.
  • 6J· W · Gough. The Social Contract : A Critical Study of its Development( Second Edition) [ M -. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1957. pp. 183 - 184.
  • 7吕世伦,周世中.以人为本与社会主义法治[M].中国大百科全书出版社,2006.55.
  • 8辛向阳.政府理论·第一篇[M].山东人民出版社,2003.124-125.
  • 9[澳]布伦南,[美]布坎南.秋风,等译.规则的理由--宪政的政治经济学[M].中国社会科学出版社,2004.31.
  • 10[英]洛克.政府论·下篇[M].商务印书馆,1995.18.

二级参考文献13

  • 1[2]Dahl, R@A. A Preface to Democracy[M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1956.
  • 2[4]Held@D.Models of Democracy[M].Stanford:Stanford:University Press, 1996.
  • 3[5]Buchanan James M. Liberty, Market and State[M].The Harvester Press,1986.
  • 4[7]Samuelson,Paul A.& Nordhaus William D.Economics:12th Edition[M].Mcgraw-hill Book Company, 1985.
  • 5[9]小林良彰.公共选择[M].北京:经济日报出版社,1989.
  • 6[10]Norman Fronlich & Joe A. Oppenheimer. Modem Political Economy[M].New Jevsey:Prentice-Hall, INC,Englwood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1978.
  • 7[12]肯@阿罗.社会选择与个人价值[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1987.
  • 8[14]安@德@雅赛.重申自由主义[M].1991.
  • 9[15]傅殷才.新保守主义经济学[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1992.
  • 10[16]张辰龙.直接民主与间接民主[M].上海:三联书店,1998.

共引文献64

同被引文献51

引证文献8

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部