摘要
吴致远、梁国钊两先生的《诺贝尔奖评委会亏待了吴健雄吗?》这篇文章,对《吴健雄——诺贝尔奖亏待了的华人女性科学家》一文的部分观点提出了批评。本文从七个方面对他们的批评做出回应,并着重就"提出问题与解决问题"、"脑的发现"与"眼的发现"、如何看待诺贝尔奖、"吴健雄的实验够不够好"、"精确与原创是什么关系"等关键问题,做适当讨论。
Mr Wu and Liang criticize some viewpoints in the article Chien -Shiung Wu and the Nobel Prize in their paper Did the Nobel Prize really treat Chien - Shiung Wu unfairly? This article responded their criticism from seven aspects, and stressed some key point, including pose and solve problems, the discovery of brain, how to see the Nobel Prize, is the experiment of Chien - shiung Wu good enough, what is the relationship between accuracy and original.
出处
《科学学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第10期1594-1600,共7页
Studies in Science of Science
基金
江苏省档案局档案科技项目(2009-L10)
关键词
吴健雄
宇称不守恒
理论科学
实验科学
Chien- Shiung Wu
parity violation
theoretical science
experimental science