解读自由主义公民身份的理路——从消极到积极的个人本位被引量：3

Reading the Rationale behind Liberalism Citizenship——From Negative to Positive Individualism

下载PDF

导出

摘要自由主义公民身份随着历史的推进,其内涵不断变迁,但其内核依然是个体本位。古典自由主义时期的自由主义公民身份表现为个人自由最大化,是一种消极意义身份。现代自由主义时期,自由主义公民身份呈现出积极的一面,除了强调基本的公民权利外,更关护政治权利和社会权利。罗尔斯以来的平等主义的自由主义公民身份强调自主的个体在能力上的平等,尤其是公民积极参与社会合作的能力。 The content of the liberalism citizenship varied a lot in the western political history,but its core is still of the protection of individual rights.In the time of Classical Liberalism,citizenship which was called negative citizenship was to develop the individual freedom and protect it from regulating by government.In the time of Modern Liberalism,citizenship is more positive,including not only civil rights but also political right and social rights.The egalitarianism developed by Rawls saw citizenship as a universal identity in the public sphere,and emphasizes ability to cooperate in the society.

作者刁瑷辉

机构地区南京大学政府管理学院

出处《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》北大核心 2011年第5期23-27,共5页 Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)

基金国家社会科学基金项目(07BZZ007)

关键词公民身份古典自由主义现代自由主义个人 citizenship Classical Liberalism Modern Liberalism individual

分类号 D6 [政治法律—中外政治制度] B089 [哲学宗教—哲学理论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1彼特·H·舒克.自由主义公民权[M]∥恩靳·伊辛,布雷恩·特纳.公民权研究手册.王小章,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2007:177-195.
2洛克.政府论:下篇[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964..
3德里克·希特.何谓公民身份[M].郭忠华,译.长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2007.
4郭中华.公民身份的解释范式与分析走向[M]∥布赖恩·特纳.公民身份与社会理论.郭中华,蒋红军,译.长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2007:1-14.
5罗纳德·德沃金．至上的美德：平等的理论与实践[M]．南京：江苏人民出版社,2003．
6约翰·罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].南京:译林出版社,2000:298.
7刘雪梅.罗尔斯正义理论中的人性观:政治的还是形而上学的[J].社会科学研究,2010(3):110-119. 被引量：4
8约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,1988..
9宋建丽.差异公民资格与正义：艾利斯·马瑞恩·杨政治哲学探微[J].妇女研究论丛,2007(5):50-55. 被引量：7
10Stephen, M. Liberal Virtues : Citizenship, Virture and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism [ M ]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990:278.

二级参考文献24

1John Rawls, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, p. 27, p. 27, p. 188, p. 178, p. 181, p. 307, p. 87, p. 19, p. 19, p. 52, p. 48, p. 50, p. 52, p. 54, p. 79, p. 19, p. 49, p. 181, p. 319, p. 318.
2John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, revised edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 79, xiii, p. 312, p. 267, p. 513, p. 478.
3John Rawls, Social Unity and Primary Goods, Collected Paper, edited by Samuel Freeman, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2001, p. 367.
4John Rawls, Lectures on The History of Moral Philosophy, edited by Barbara Herman, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000, p. 164.
5Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, 5 : 120 - 121.
6Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, 4: 435, 4:430 - 1, 4: 436, 4: 435, 4: 435, 4: 429.
7康德.实用人类学[M].邓晓芒译.上海世纪出版集团,2005.276.
8John Rawls, A Theory of Juatice, revised edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 221 -224.
9《正义论》一书第三编“目标”.英文修订本1999年版452页.
10John Rawls, Political Liberalism, New York : Columbia University Press, 1993, p. 48n1.