期刊文献+

前科学时代自然观模式的演变及其认知机制

Evolution of the views about nature in the prescience age and its cognitive mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知的透视性使得自然的绝对客观论被抛弃,随后出现的"精致表征"理论较好地解释了自然观演变的内在机制。随着次级工具的出现和社会文化的发展,自然观依次出现了图腾模型、生机论和机械式生机论。当人类对知识的理性检验能力增强后,"神创说"的表征空间最终让位于机械论。自然从认识的背景凸显为认识的对象是自然观模型演变的主要认知机制,但转变却让自然失去了应有的生机和整体的完整。 Absolute objectivism is abandoned with the appearance of cognitive perspectivism.Sophisticated representationism is considered to be a good theory to explain the evolution of the views of nature.With the emergence of secondary tools and development of society and culture,there appear three patterns of the views about nature,which are totem model,the vitalism theory and the mechanical vitalism theory.When the representational space departs from the theory of Genesis,there comes the age of mechanical theory.In this cognitive transformation,nature is not understood as the background but as the subject of cognition.Paradoxically,the change in cognition causes the nature to lose its vitality and overall integrity.
出处 《武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第5期547-550,共4页 Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目(编号:Y1080606) 国家"985"哲学社会科学创新基地项目(编号:205000-811342)
关键词 自然 表征空间 图腾崇拜 次级工具 认知机械主义 nature representational space totemism secondary tool cognitive mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Robert A Meyers. Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag,2009:2 697-2 698.
  • 2Ronald N Giere. An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation[J]. Synthese, 2010 (172) :269-270.
  • 3Edwin Hung. The nature of science[M]. Belment: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997:446-448.
  • 4马歇尔·科林斯.“土著”如何思考:以库克船长为例[M].张宏明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2003:8.
  • 5W·C·丹皮尔.科学史及其与哲学和宗教的关系[M].李珩,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:34.
  • 6蔡进.自然之子与自然之敌——关于中医未来走向的思索之二[J].读书,2008(4):159-167. 被引量:2
  • 7埃德蒙·利奇.文化与交流[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000..
  • 8B·马林诺夫斯基.科学的文化理论[M].北京:中央民族大学出版社,1999.65.
  • 9理查德·S·韦斯特福尔.近代科学的建构[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2000.119-121.
  • 10柯林武德.自然的观念[M].吴国盛,译.北京:华夏出版社,1990:19-27.

二级参考文献7

  • 1莱布尼茨与克拉克论战书信集[M].胨修斋译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
  • 2H G Alexander.The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence[M].Manchester,1998.
  • 3R S Woolhouse,Richard Fmacks,G W Leibniz.Philosophical Texts[M].Oxford,1998.
  • 4Alexandre Koyre.From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe[M].London,1970.
  • 5Roger Ariew,Daniel Garber,G W Leibniz.Philosophical Essays[M].Indiana,1989.
  • 6Ezio Vailati.Leibniz and Clarke,A Study of Their Correspondence[M].New York,1997.
  • 7莱布尼茨.《单子论》第87-89节.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部