期刊文献+

心脏瓣膜术后Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞的临床分析 被引量:1

Clinical analysis of degree Ⅲ atrioventricular block after cardiac valve surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨心脏瓣膜术后Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞(Ⅲ°AVB)的发生原因、影响因素及相关治疗措施.方法 回顾性分析我院2000年1月至2008年12月3674例心脏瓣膜术后9例发生持续性Ⅲ°AVB并行永久性起搏器置入术患者的临床资料.心脏病因:风湿性心脏瓣膜病2例,感染性心内膜炎2例,主动脉瓣二叶畸形2例(其中合并感染性心内膜炎1例),退行性主动脉瓣病变1例,先天性房室管畸形1例(既往有心脏手术史),二尖瓣脱垂及非对称性肥厚性心肌病各1例.行主动脉瓣置换4例、二尖瓣置换2例、二尖瓣置换及三尖瓣成形1例、Bentall术1例、左室流出道疏通及二尖瓣置换1例.结果 本组9例患者,术后早期出现Ⅲ°AVB 7例,术后24~48 h出现Ⅲ°AVB 1例,术后4年出现Ⅲ°AVB 1例.出现Ⅲ°AVB持续时间超过2~3周不能恢复者,均行永久性起搏器置入术,其中采用DDD起搏器4例、VVI起搏器5例.无晚期死亡患者.结论 心脏瓣膜术后出现Ⅲ°AVB大多发生于术后早期,与手术部位有一定关系.术中注重心脏瓣膜结构与房室结及传导束的解剖关系,是预防术后出现Ⅲ°AVB的关键.Ⅲ°AVB持续时间超过2~3周者需行永久性起搏器置入术. Objective To explore the reasons, oventrieular block after cardiac valve surgery. Methods influencing factors and treatments of the degree Ⅲ atri- Retrospeetive data of 9 patients with persistent degree Ⅱ atrioventricular block after cardiac valve surgery who received pacemaker implantation treatment between January 2000 and December 2008. Cardiac pathology including rheumatic valvular heart disease in 2 patients, degenerative aortic valvular disease in 1 patient, infective endocarditis in 2 patients, bicuspid aortic valve in 1 patient and with infective endocarditis in 1 patient, complete atrioventricular septal defect in 1 patient, others including mitral valve prolapse and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in one patient. 4 patients had aortic valve replacement, 2 patients had mitral valve replacement, others including mitral valve replacement and tricuspid valve surgery, left ventricular outflow tract surgery and mitral valve replacement and Bentall in one patient. Results The onset of most postoperative degree Ⅲ atrioventrieular block was noted in the immediate postoperative period, 1 case happened after 4 years. The patients received pacemaker implantation treatment, if degree m AVB was present after cardiac valve surgery and persisted for 2-3 weeks. Of the 9 patients, 4 cases were treated with DDD pacemaker, others were VVI pacemaker. Condusion Valve surgery sites are the key factors to AVB after cardiac valve surgery. Mostly are noted in immediate postoperative period. Patients with degree Ⅲ AVB persist more than 2-3 weeks should be treated with permanent pacemaker implantation.
出处 《中国心血管病研究》 CAS 2011年第10期736-739,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research
关键词 胰岛素抵抗 急性冠脉综合征 稳态模型指数 Cardiac valve surgery Degree m atrioventricular block Permanent pacemaker
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Weindling SN,Saul JP,Gamble WJ,et al.Duration of complete atrioventricular block after congenital heart disease surgery.Am J Cardiol,1998,82:525.
  • 2Yip WC,Zimmerman F,Hijazi ZM.Heart block and empirical therapy aftert ranscatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2005,66:436-441.
  • 3Koplan BA,Stevenson WG,Epstein LM,et al.Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict the need for permanent pacing after cardiac valve surgery.J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41:795-801.
  • 4Kim MH,Deeb GM,Engle KA,et al.Complete atrioventricular block after valvular heart surgery and the timing of pacemaker implantation.Am J Cardiol,2001,87:649-651.
  • 5Berberian G,Quinn TA,Kanter JP,et al.Optimized biventricular pacing in atrioventricular block after cardiac surgery.Ann Thorac Surg,2005,80:870-875.
  • 6桂春,朱立光.起搏方式选择的研究现状[J].中国心血管病研究,2005,3(11):867-870. 被引量:2

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]Rediker DE, Eagle KA, Homma S, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol, 1988,61:323-329.
  • 2[2]Ellenbogen KA, Stambler BS, Orav E J, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients intolerant to VVIR pacing. Am J Cardiol, 2000,86: 59-63.
  • 3[3]Link MS, Hellkamp AS, Estes NA 3rd, et al. High incidence of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST). J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,43: 2072-2074.
  • 4[4]Saccomanno G, Marini M, Amadio L, et al. Permanent cardiac pacing and thromboembolic risk in elderly patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 1995,20 : 29-36.
  • 5[5]Greenspon AJ, Hart RG, Dawson D,et al. Predictors of stroke in patients paced for sick sinus syndrome. J AmColl Cardiol,2004,43: 1623-1624.
  • 6[6]Soylu M, Ozdemir O, Geyik B,et al. Evaluation of the early hemodynamic changes in carotid arteries during ventricular and dual chamber pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2004,27: 1540-1544.
  • 7[7]Altun A, Erdogan O, Yildiz M. Acute effect of DDD versus VVI pacing on arterial distensibility. Cardiology,2004,102: 89-92.
  • 8[8]Bush DE, Finucane TE. permanent cardiac pacemakers in the elderly. J Am Geriatr, 1994,42: 326-334.
  • 9[9]Shen WK, Neubauer SA, Espinosa RE, et al. Should age be a consideration inmode selection in permanent pacing? A survival analysis.J Am Coll. Cardiol, 1995 (Abs. Suppl):13A-16A.
  • 10[10]Masumoto H, Ueda Y, Kato R,et al. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.Europace, 2004,6:444-450.

共引文献1

同被引文献26

  • 1Songur CM, Simsek E, Ozen A, et al. Long term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses in the tricuspid valve position: which valve types are better---mechanical or biological prostheses? [J]. Heart Lung Circ, 2014, 23(12): 1175-1178.
  • 2Rizzoli G, Vendramin I, Nesseris G, et al. Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis o f intra-institutional results[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004, 77(5): 1607-1614.
  • 3Aoyagi S, Hishi Yj Kawara T, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement with the St.Jude medical valve[J]. Surg Today, 1994, 24(1): 6-12.
  • 4Van Nooten GJ, Caes F, Taeymans Y, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: postoperative and long-term results[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1995, 110(3): 672-679.
  • 5Singh SK, Tang GH, Maganti MD, et al. Midterm outcomes of tricuspid valve repair versus replacement for organic tricuspid disease[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 82(5): 1735-1741.
  • 6Sugimoto T, Okada M, Yamashita C, et al. Repeat tricuspid valve replacement for acquired valvular heart disease: report of a case[J]. Surg Today, 1998, 28(10): 1112-1114.
  • 7McGrath LB, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Bailey BM, et al. Tricuspid valve operations in 530 patients. Twenty-five-year assessment of early and late phase events[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1990, 99(1): 124- 133.
  • 8Civelek A, Ak K, Akgiin S, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 56(8): 456-460.
  • 9Tokunaga S, Masuda M, Shiose A, et al. Long-term results of isolated tricuspid valve replacement[J]. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2008, 16(1): 25-28.
  • 10Garatti A, Nano G, Bruschi G, et al. Twenty-five year outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement comparing mechanical and biologic prostheses [J]. Ann Tnorac Surg~ 2012, 93(4): 1146-1153.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部