期刊文献+

新透析器两种预冲方法对预防首用综合征的效果分析 被引量:2

Comparative analysis of two different pre-hedging methods for preventing the first-use syndrome in dialysis patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较新透析器两种预冲方法对预防首用综合征(first-use syndrome,FUS)的作用。方法将发生过FUS的60例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各30例。治疗组患者新透析器采用上一次透析后残留在血路管静脉段的淡血水进行预冲及消毒灭菌处理后使用,对照组新透析器采用0.9%生理盐水常规预冲后使用。比较新透析器两种预冲方法患者透析过程FUS发生情况。结果治疗组患者无发生FUS,对照组发生率为20.0%,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论新透析器使用自身残留淡血水灌新透析器进行预冲,可降低患者发生FUS。 Objective To compare the two different pre-hedging methods for preventing the first-use syndrome in dialysis patients. Methods 60 patients contracting first-use syndrome were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group. In the treatment group,the blood and water left in the dialyzers were poured into a new dialyzer,soaked for 30 min,drained,washed,and held for 24 hours. In the control group,the new dialyzers were filled with 500 mL saline,emptied fully and then flushed with 500 mL saline,and finally were closed with 20 mg heparin for 20 min. Results No first-use syndromes were observed in treatment group and 20.0% in control group. There were significant differences statistically in the two groups(P 0.05) . Conclusion The disinfection of the new dialyzers by way of soaking may reduce the incidence of first-use syndrome.
出处 《现代临床护理》 2011年第9期39-40,共2页 Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词 血液透析 透析器 首用综合征 hemodialysis dialyzer first-use syndrome
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1Mitwalli AH, Abed J, Tarif N, et al . Dialyzer reuse impact on dialyzer efficiency, patient morbidity and mortality and cost effectiveness[J].Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ,2001,12 (3) :305-311.
  • 2Opatrny K, Jr. Clinical importance of biocompatibility and its effect on haemodialysis treatment [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant ,2003 , 18 Suppl 5 :v41-44.
  • 3Twardowski ZJ. Dialyzer reuse-part II: advantages and disadvantages[J]. Seminars in Dialysis ,2006,19(3):217-226.
  • 4Craddoek PR, Hammerschmidt D, White JG. Complement (CS-a)-induced granulocyte aggregation in vitro. A possible mechanism of complement-mediated leukostasis and leukopenia[J]. J Clin Invest ,1977,60(1):260-264.
  • 5Stroncek DF, Keshaviah P, Craddock PR, et al . Effect of dialyzer reuse on complement activation and neutropenia in he modialysis[J]. J Lab Clin Med , 1984,104(3) :304-311.
  • 6ND Vaziri, J Wang, T Cesario, et al . Induction, transcription, synthesis and adsorption of interleukin 1 by dialyzer memhranes[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol , 1994,4 ( 11 ) : 1884-1889.
  • 7Singh NP, Bansal R, Thakur A, et al . Effect of membrane composition on cytokine production and clinical symptoms during hemodialysis: a crossover study[J]. Renal Failure , 2003 ,25(3) :419-430.
  • 8Sarkar SR, Kaitwatcharachai C, Levin NW. Nitric oxide and hemodialysis[J]. Seminars in Dialysis , 2004 , 17 (3) : 224- 228.
  • 9Pereira BJ, Natov SN, Sundaram S, et al . Impact of single use versus reuse of cellulose dialyzers on clinical parameters and indices of biocompatibility[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol , 1996 , 7(6) :861-870.
  • 10侯建全,郭震华,陈赐龄,李建勇,王辉.血液透析膜对血小板α颗粒膜蛋白的影响[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,1999,8(1):36-37. 被引量:13

共引文献12

同被引文献10

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部