期刊文献+

语言库藏类型学构想 被引量:138

Linguistic inventory typology:A proposal for a new approach of linguistic typology
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文倡议建立语言类型学的新分支——语言库藏类型学。本文指出,一种语言拥有哪些语言手段,哪些范畴在语言形式中成为显赫范畴并扩展至其他范畴的表达,哪些范畴在语言中缺乏专用手段,要靠其他手段来表达,这些库藏方面的语种差异使跨语言的形—义关系更加复杂,是语言类型的重要成因。类型学传统上主要从语义、语用范畴出发,看它们在语言形式中如何表达。语言库藏类型学关注语义语用范畴和形式手段的双向互动,尤其关注形式手段及其显赫性的差异对范畴表达的影响,并关注语言库藏差异中表现出来的语言共性。 This paper proposes linguistic inventory typology as an approach to linguistic typology.The proposed approach attempts to show how linguistic inventory shapes typological features of languages.It is argued that inventory diversities among languages,such as what kinds of means a language possesses,which semantic and pragmatic categories are prominent and powerful so that their formal means can expand to the denotation of other categories,and which categories are lacking special means and have to appeal to means for other categories to express,make the cross-linguistic form-meaning correspondence more complicated than it appears.Such differences among languages are important factors underlying language types.The current approaches in typology mainly begin with semantic and pragmatic categories and focus on the examination of how these categories are denoted with formal means.Linguistic inventory typology will pay more attention to the bidirectional interaction between semantic/pragmatic categories and formal means.The impact on denotation of categories imposed by the differences in inventory and category prominence among languages will be examined.In the meantime,attention also will be paid to universals behind the inventory diversity and the relationships between category expansion and the semantic map approach.
作者 刘丹青
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期289-303,379,共15页 Contemporary Linguistics
基金 中国社会科学院重点课题"语言库藏类型学"资助
关键词 语言库藏类型学 凸显类型学 显赫性 形-义对应关系 linguistic inventory typology,prominence typology,mightiness,form-meaning mapping
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Aikhenvald, A. 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Aikhenvald, A. 2006. Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In A. Aikhenvald and R. M.W. Dixon, eds., Serial Verbs Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1- 68.
  • 3Bhat, D. N. S. 2000. Word classes and sentential functions. In P. A. Vogel and B. Comrie, eds. , Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 47- 63.
  • 4Dryer, M. 1997. Are grammatical universal? In J. Bybee, J. Haiman and S. Thompson, eds., Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 115- 43.
  • 5Greenberg, J. 1966 [ 1963]. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greemberg, ed., Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Pp. 73- 113.
  • 6Haspelmath, M. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Thomasello, ed., The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 211 - 42.
  • 7Himmelmann, N. 2001. Articles. In M. Haspelmath, E. Ktinig, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible, eds., Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Vol. I. Berlin ! New York: Waiter de Gruyter. Pp. 831 -41.
  • 8Li, C.N. (李讷) and S.A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C.N. Li., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 457-90.
  • 9Matthews, S. and P. Pacioni. 1997. Specificity and genericity in Cantonese and Mandarin. In Xu L.J. (徐烈炯), ed., The Referential Properties of Chinese Noun Phrases. Paris: CRLAO. Ecole des hautes etudes en sciences sociales. Pp. 45 - 59.
  • 10Plank, F. (archivist general). 2009. The Universals Archive. http://typo, uni-konstanz, de/archive [accessed, Jun 17, 2011].

二级参考文献60

共引文献743

同被引文献1514

引证文献138

二级引证文献655

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部