期刊文献+

级差含义的语义属性及其在事况逻辑中的阐释 被引量:1

The semantics of scalar implicature and its interpretation in episodic logic
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文的研究对象是级差含义的语义属性,即剥离语境的级差含义。本文的研究工具是事况逻辑——一种自然语言处理的逻辑系统。用事况逻辑中命题与事况的关系以及事况间的隶属关系阐释级差含义,不仅从句子外部赋予级差含义更深刻的逻辑内涵,而且发掘了两种在传统研究中不被重视的级差含义——基于时态的级差含义和话语级别上的级差含义。 This paper presents a study of semantics of scalar implicature,i.e.,the context-stripped scalar implicature,in the framework of episodic logic,a powerful logic for natural language processing.Drawing on the relations between propositions and episodes and the part-of relations between episodes in episodic logic,scalar implicature is examined beyond the level of sentence.Furthermore,two less noticed scalar implicatures,i.e.,tense-based scalar implicature and discourse-level scalar implicature,also are dealt with.
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期351-360,380,共10页 Contemporary Linguistics
关键词 级差含义 事况逻辑 事况隶属 信息持真 scalar implicature,episodic logic,part-of relations,information persistence
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Barwise, J. and J. Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • 2Breheny, R., N. Katsos, and J. Williams. 2006. Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition 100,434- 63.
  • 3~ Carston, R. 1998. Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston and S. Uchida, eds., Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 179-236.
  • 4Chien A. 2008. Scalar implieature and eontrastive explanation. Synthese 161,47-66.
  • 5Chierchia, G. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Bel- letti, ed. , Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford Univer- sity Press. Pp. 39 - 103.
  • 6Davis, W.A. 1998. Implicature: Intention, Convention and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Geurts, B. 2006. Implicature as a discourse phenomenon. In E. Puig-Waldmfiller, ed., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Pp. 261-75.
  • 8Greenhall, O. 2008. Against Chierchia's computational account of scalar implicatures. Proceedings of the Aristo-telian Society 108. Pp. 373 - 84.
  • 9Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In S. Davis, ed., Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 305 - 15.
  • 10Hwang, C.H. and L. Schubert. 1993. Episodic logic: A situational logic for natural language processing. In P. Aczel, D. Israel, and Y. Katagiri, eds., Situation Theory and Its Applications. Vol. 3. Stanford, CA : CSLI. Pp. 303 - 38.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Meibauer, J. Lying and falsely implicating [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2005, ( 37 ) : 1373 - 1399.
  • 2Grice, P. Logic and conversation [ A ]. S. Davis. Pragmatics: A reader [ C ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. 305 - 315.
  • 3Horn, L. R. Presupposition and implicature [ A ]. S. Lappin . The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory [ C ]. Oxford : Blackwell, 1996. 299 - 320.
  • 4Levinson, S. C. Three levels of meaning [ A ]. F. Palmer. Grammar and Meaning [ C ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.90 - 115.
  • 5Levinson, S. C. Presumptive Meanings : The theory of generalized conversational implicature [M]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2000.
  • 6Gazdar, G. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form [M].New York: Academic Press, 1979.
  • 7Soames, S. How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projection problem [A]. A. Kasher. Presupposition, Implicature, and Direct Speech Acts [C]. London: Routledge, 1998.69 -148.
  • 8Hintikka, J. Knowledge and Belief [M]. New York:Comell University Press, 1962.
  • 9Kyburg, Jr., H. E., & Teng, C. Uncertain Inference [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • 10Brewka, G. Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical foundations of commonsense [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

共引文献1

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部