期刊文献+

语言知识有多少是先天的?——二语习得涌现论与先天论之辩述评 被引量:7

How much is linguistic knowledge innate? A review of the debate between emergentism and nativism in Second Language Acquisition
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对二语习得涌现论与先天论之辩进行述评。涌现论者并不都否认先天语言能力,但都否认存在先天的语法原则,认为语言知识应由非语言的因素及其互动来解释。先天论认为许多语法现象的习得只有借助先天的普遍语法才能解释。争论的焦点集中在第二语言学习者的语言知识在多大程度上是先天的。 The paper reviews the debate between emergentism and nativism in Second Language Acquisition(SLA).Not all emergentists deny innate endowment for language but they uniformly reject inborn grammatical principles(Universal Grammar).They assume that linguistic knowledge derives from the interaction of non-linguistic factors.Nativists hold that it is impossible to eliminate the role of innate linguistic knowledge in SLA.The debate centers on the issue of how much linguistic knowledge is innate.
作者 贾光茂
机构地区 南京大学
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期361-368,380,共8页 Contemporary Linguistics
基金 南京邮电大学人文社科基金NYS211006资助
关键词 涌现论 先天论 论战 普遍语法 二语习得 emergentism,nativism,Universal Grammar,SLA
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Cameron, L. and A. Deignan. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27,4:671 -90.
  • 2Casillas, G. 2008. The insufficiency of three types of learning to explain language acquisition. Lingua 118,4: 636 - 41.
  • 3Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
  • 4Chomsky, N.2007. Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland and H. Gartner, eds., Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 1 - 29.
  • 5Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 6Ellis, N. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24,2 : 143 - 88.
  • 7Ellis, N. 2003. Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C.J. Doughty and M.H. Long, eds., The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blaekwell. Pp. 63 103.
  • 8Goad, H. and L. White. 2008. Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A na- tivist approach. Lingua 118,4:577 - 94.
  • 9Goad, H., L. White, and J. Steele. 2003. Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1- constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48,3: 243-63.
  • 10Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

同被引文献97

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部