期刊文献+

4884例轻型颅脑损伤CT结果阳性患者危险因素的Logistic回归分析 被引量:7

The Logistic regression identification of risk factors for 4 884 cases of mild head injury (MHI) with abnormal computerized tomography (CT)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨轻型颅脑损伤(MHI)患者的危险因素,为临床判断MHI程度提供参考依据。方法回顾性分析4884例MHI患者的临床各因素和颅脑CT检查结果,对患者的性别、年龄(≥65岁、〈65岁)、意识丧失、逆行性健忘、呕吐、脑脊液漏、癫痫、头皮外伤、神经病学阳性体征和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)进行非条件Logistic回归分析。结果Logistic回归分析显示,性别优势比(OR)=0.703,95%可信区间(95%CI)0.53~0.94,P=0.02;年龄≥65岁OR=3.74,95%CI2.38~5.88,P=0.00;意识丧失0R=18.17,95%CI12.66~26.07,P=0.00;逆行性健忘OR=4.19,95%CI2.17~8.07,P=0.00;呕吐OR=27.01,95%CI18.45~39.55,P=0.00;脑脊液漏OR=63.80,95%CI33.01~123.30,P=0.00;癫痫OR=1.61,95%CI0.30~8.58,P=0.58;头皮外伤OR=0.95,95%C10.75~1.22,P=0.69;神经病学阳性体征OR=9.87,95%CI2.03~47.95,P=0.05;GCS评分OR=1.10,95%CI0.85~1.42,P=0.47,其中男性、高龄(≥65岁)、意识丧失、逆行性健忘、呕吐、脑脊液漏、神经病学阳性体征是MHI的危险因素。结论性别、年龄、意识丧失、逆行性健忘、呕吐、脑脊液漏、神经病学阳性体征对判断MHI程度有一定意义,可为临床处理这类损伤提供有益的参考依据。 Objective To identify the risk factors in patients with MHI for the evaluation of the severity of the damage. Methods The clinical data and brain CT findings from 4 884 MHI patients were analyzed retrospectively using non-conditional Logistic regression for their relation to gender, age (≥65 years, 〈65 years), loss of consciousness, retrograde amnesia, vomiting, cerebrospinal fluidotorrhea/rhinorrhea, epilepsy, scalp trauma, positive neurological signs and glasgow coma scale (GCS). Results The odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and confidence coefficient (P) for all the factors were demonstrated as follows, repectively, gender: (0. 703, 0.53 - 0.94, 0. 02); age ≥ 65 years: (3.74, 2.38 - 5.88, 0.00); loss of consciousness: (18.17, 12.66 - 26.07, 0. 00); retrograde amnesia: (4.19, 2.17 - 8. 07, 0.00); vomiting: (27.01, 18.45-39.55, 0.00); cerebrospinal fluid-otorrhea/ rhinorrhea: (63.80, 33.01 123.30, 0.00); epilepsy: (1.61, 0.30-8.58, 0.58); scalp trauma: (0.95, 0.75 - 1.22, 0.69); positive neurological signs: (9.87, 2.03 -47.95, 0. 05); and GCS score: (1.10, 0. 85 - 1.42, 0. 47). The factor male, age≥65 years, loss of consciousness, retrograde forgetfulness, vomiting, cerebrospina[ fluid-otorrhea/rhinorrhea, and positive neurological signs were found to be risk factors for MHI. Conclusion The risk factors as listed above may serve as indexes in the severity evaluation for MHI, and the design of treatment-plan for the patients.
出处 《中国危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期613-615,共3页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 北京市大兴区科技资助项目(2008-1)
关键词 颅脑损伤 轻型 颅脑CT 危险因素 LOGISTIC回归分析 Mild head injury Brain computerized tomography Risk factor Logistic regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness:a practical scale. Lancet,1974,2:81-84.
  • 2胡宁利,江学成.4种创伤评分法在颅脑外伤中的评估价值[J].中国危重病急救医学,2003,15(4):237-238. 被引量:11
  • 3梁建业,孙宝权,彭宁安.APACHE评分与GCS用于ICU严重脑外伤患者的比较[J].中国危重病急救医学,2002,14(11):686-688. 被引量:7
  • 4Thiruppathy SP,Muthukumar N. Mild head injury:revisited. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2004,146 : 1075-1082.
  • 5Nagy KK, Joseph KT, Krosner SM, et al. The utility of head computed tomography after minimal head injury. J Trauma, 1999,46:268-270.
  • 6Ono K, Wada K, Takahara T, et al. Indications for computed tomography in patients with mild head injury. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2007,47 : 291-297.
  • 7Jeret JS, Mandell M, Anziska B, et al. Clinical predictors of abnormality disclosed by computed tomography after mild head trauma . Neurosurgery, 1993,32 : 9-15.
  • 8Gomez PA, Lobato RD, Ortega JM, et al. Mild head injury: differences in prognosis among patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and analysis of factors associated with abnormal CT findings. Br J Neurosurg, 1996,10 : 453-460.
  • 9Sadowski-Cron C, Stupnieki A, Zimmerrnann H. Minimal eraniocerebral trauma. Ther Umseh, 2000,57 : 709-715.
  • 10彭瑞云,高亚兵,肖兴义,王德文,陈浩宇,吴小红,刘杰,胡文华,蔡宝仁.bFGF和NGF基因在大鼠脑震荡脑损伤中的表达研究[J].中国危重病急救医学,2003,15(4):213-216. 被引量:4

二级参考文献20

  • 1梁英杰,凌启波.一种快速高敏感的免疫组织化学染色法—LSAB法[J].中华病理学杂志,1993,22(6):369-369. 被引量:71
  • 2林治瑾.临床外科学(第一版)[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1995.1795.
  • 3杨遇春 李世绰 程学铭 等.中国六城市颅脑损伤的流行病学调查[J].中华神经外科学杂志,1987,1(3):23-23.
  • 4江学成 马黎阳 胡宁利 等.创伤计分和创伤病人对麻醉和手术的承受能力[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1988,8(2):91-93.
  • 5黄显奋 俞在芳.学习和记忆[A].徐绍芬主编.神经生物学[M]:第2版[C].上海:上海医科大学出版社,1999.386-409.
  • 6江学成 胡宁利.创伤评分工具集中文版软件[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(8):453-453.
  • 7Evans RW.The postconcussion syndrome and the sequelae of mild head injury.Neurol Clin,1992,10(4):815-847.
  • 8Rimel RW,Giordani B,Barth J,et al.Disability caused by minor head injury.Neurosurgery,1981,9(1):211-228.
  • 9Binder L.Persistent symptoms after mild head injury:a review of the postconcussive syndrome.J Exp Neuropsychol,1986,8(1):323-346.
  • 10Li M,Yasuda RP,Wsll SJ,et al.Distribution of M2 muscarinic receptors in rat brain using antisera selective for M2 receptors.Mol Pharmacol,1991,40(1):28-35.

共引文献23

同被引文献68

引证文献7

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部