期刊文献+

美国反家庭暴力立法的三波浪潮及其可能走向 被引量:6

Three Waves of American Domestic Violence Law Reform and Its Trend
下载PDF
导出
摘要 女权主义理论在美国的反家庭暴力立法过程中一直发挥着推波助澜的作用。第一次女权主义运动揭露了妇女保护的不足,第二次女权主义运动后,美国通过消除立法歧视,加强公权力干预和民事权利救济,以及拓展社会服务,建立起一套相对成熟的防治家庭暴力的理论和制度。但随着立法的发展以及后现代女权主义对现有制度的质疑,反家庭暴力立法存在的问题也渐渐凸显。只有坚持反家庭暴力的国际人权标准,消除性别歧视以达致社会性别结构的平等,才能拔除家庭暴力的根源。 Feminism theories have played a significant role in the process of American domestic violence legislation.In the first-wave movement feminists exposed the domestic violence problem to the public for the first time.The second-wave feminism movement has established a framework of preventing domestic violence by eliminating formal inequality,enhancing criminal penalties and civil remedies and expanding social services.Despite great achievements,however,the law reform has been increasingly criticized by contemporary feminists and being challenging some important contradictions and conflicts.This article emphasizes that domestic violence could only be eradicated by insisting on domestic violence human rights standard,which aims to eliminate sex discrimination and equalize gender structure.
作者 罗清
机构地区 中国政法大学
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2011年第3期17-23,共7页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 美国 家庭暴力 立法 女权主义 性别平等 U.S. domestic violence legislation feminism gender equality
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1黄列,陈明侠.性别与法律研究概论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009:44.
  • 2Elizabeth M. Schneider. Battered Women & Feminist Lawmaking[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000: 16.
  • 3Victoria Nourse. Symposium on Unfinished Feminist Business: The "Normal" Successes and Failures of Feminism and the Criminal Law[ J]. Chicago- Kent Law Review, Vol. 75, 2000 : 951 - 962.
  • 4陈红,李华.从女性主义的视角重新理解“正当防卫”[J].浙江学刊,2005(4):216-218. 被引量:13
  • 5波拉-F.曼格姆,黄列.受虐妇女综合症证据的重新概念化:检控机关对有关暴力的专家证词的利用[J].环球法律评论,2003,25(127):135-149. 被引量:23
  • 6National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. A Guide for Effective Issuance and Enforcement of Protection Orders [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011 - 02 - 15 ]. http://www. ncjfcj, org/images/stories/dept/fvd/pdf/ burgundy _book_final. pdf.
  • 7Neal Miller. Domestic Violence: A Review of State Legislation Defining Police and Prosecution Duties and Powers [ M ]. Alexandria: Institute For Law & Justice, 2004:24.
  • 8California State Senate, Office of Research. California' s Response to Domestic Violence : A History of Policy Issues and Legislative Actions to Combat Domestic Violence in California[ M ]. California: California Senate Office of Research,2003:29 - 31.
  • 9Elizabeth M. Schneider. Domestic Violence Law Reform in the Twenty - First Century: Looking Back and Looking Forward[J]. Family Law Quarterly,Vol. 3, 2008: 359.
  • 10刘小楠.美国女权主义法学平等与差异观研究[J].法制与社会发展,2005,11(3):147-154. 被引量:17

二级参考文献17

  • 1Catharine A. Mackinnon. Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence [A]. in D. Kelly Weisberg (ed.). Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations [C]. Temple University Press, 1991.
  • 2Martha ChamaUas. Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory [ M]. Aspen Publishers, A Wohers Kluwer Company, 2003.
  • 3Patricia A. Cain. Feminism and the Limits of Equality [A]. in D. Kelly Weisberg (ed.). Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations[ C]. Temple University Press, 1991.
  • 4Henna Hill Kay. Equality and Difference: The Case of Pregnancy [A]. in Patricia Smith (ed.). Feminist Jurisprudence [C].Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • 5Martha Chamallas. Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory [ M]. Aspen Publishers, A Wolters Kluwer Company, 2003.
  • 6Wendy Williams, Equality' s Riddle: Pregnancy and the Equal Treatment/Special Treatment Debate [J]. 13 N. Y. U. Rev.L. & Soc. Change, 1984-85.
  • 7Robin West. Jurisprudence and Gender [A]. in Patricia Smith (ed.). Feminist Jurisprudence [C]. Oxford University Press,1993.
  • 8Catharine A. Mackinnon. Desire and Power, in Feminism Unmodified [M]. Harvard University Press, 1987.
  • 9Catharine A. Mackinnon. Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination [A]. in Feminism Unmodified [C]. Harvard University Press, 1987.
  • 10Martha Minow. Feminist Reason: Getting It and Losing It [M]. J. Legal Educ, 1988.

共引文献48

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部