期刊文献+

论罗尔斯《万民法》中的人权观 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 人权的普世意义一直是全球正义关注的焦点,也是后者的基础。罗尔斯的《万民法》将全球正义的研究推向了一个新阶段,而《万民法》中的人权观也引发了诸多争议。概而言之,罗尔斯支持了一种具有普世意义的人权观,并以之作为万民法的基础。但由于罗尔斯注重程序正义,拒绝任何形式的人性理论,他的人权观缺乏完善的论证基础。而且,由于罗尔斯过多强调人权对于维护世界和平的功能,这使他的人权清单内容比较"薄",对合宜等级社会也比较宽容。理论上的这些特征引来了不少学者的批评。
作者 向青山
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《道德与文明》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期61-65,共5页 Morality and Civilization
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1John Rawls. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 65-74.
  • 2R. J. Vincent. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 14-15.
  • 3John Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971, pp. 505--506.
  • 4Wilfried Hinsch & Markus Stepanians. Human Rights as Moral Claim Rights. In Rex Martin & David A. Reidy (eds.), Rawls' s Law of Peoples : A Realistic Utopia ? Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. , 2006, pp. 119--121.
  • 5Allen Buchanan. Taking the Human out of Human Rights. In Rex Martin & David A. Reidy (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2006, pp. 154-155.
  • 6Thomas Pogge. An Egalitarian Law of Peoples. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1994, (3).
  • 7David A. Reidy. Political Authority and Human Rights. In Rex Martin & David A. Reidy (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2006, p. 169.

同被引文献23

  • 1RAWLS J. The Law of Peoples[ M]. Harvard: Harvard U- niversity Press, 1999.
  • 2IGNESKI V. A sufficiently political orthodox coni'epii,,n of human rights [ J]. Journal of Global Ethics, 2014, IO (2) : 167 - 182.
  • 3ALLEN BUCHANAN. Taking the Human out of l luanan Rights [ M ] // Rex Martin and David A. Reidy (ed.) Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?. Malden: Blackwell Publishing,2006.
  • 4TASIOULAS J. From Utopia to Kazanistan: John Ranwls and the Law of peoples [ J ]. Oxford Journal of Legal Slud- ies,2002,22 ( 2 ) : 386.
  • 5NICKEL J W. Are Human Rights Mainly Implemented hv Intervention? [ M ] // MARTIN R, Reidy D A ed. Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?. Maid,'n: Blackwell Publishing, 2006:270.
  • 6GRIFFIN J. Human Rights and the Autonomy of Interna- tional Law [ M ] // BESSON S, TASIOULAS J ed. The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford Universi- ty Press, 2010: 343.
  • 7TASIOULAS J , On the nature of human rights [ M ]// ERNST G and JAN - CHRISTOPH HEILINGER ( ed. ). The Philosophy of Human Rights : Contemporary Coalro- versies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, 2012:55 -56.
  • 8WALDRON J. Human Rights: A Critique of the Raz/ Rawls Approach [ J ]. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 405,2013.
  • 9FORST J. The justification of human rights and the Dasis right to justification: a reflexive approach [ J]. Ethics, 2010,120(4) : 728.
  • 10WILKINS B. Rawls on Human Rights: A Review Fsaity[J]. The Journal of Ethics,2008(12) : 112.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部