摘要
目的探讨内隐职业刻板印象、内隐职业偏爱及其加工机制,更好地指导大学生和在职人员的职业选择和发展。方法内隐联想测验和纸笔版反应与不反应联想任务。结果①性别主效应不显著(F=0.649,P=0.424),任务主效应显著(F=1141.930,P=0.000),性别和任务的交互作用不显著(F=0.109,P=0.743);②专业技术组被试(t=-41.708,P=0.000)和服务组被试(t=-19.499,P=0.000)不相容任务的反应时都大于相容任务的反应时,且差异显著;③认知资源主效应不显著(F=2.546,P=0.116),组块主效应显著(F=84.975,P=0.000),认知资源和组块的交互作用显著(F=9.714,P=0.000)。结论存在内隐职业刻板印象和职业刻板偏爱;职业刻板印象的信息加工是自动化的,遵循图式过滤器模型。
Objective To explore the implicit occupational stereotypes,the implicit occupational preferences and its processing mechanism,in order to better guide college students and on-the-job personnel career choice and development.Methods Implicit association test and paper-edition go/no-go association test were used.Results ①Gender main effects were not significant(F=0.649,P=0.424),task main effects were significant(F=1141.930,P=0.000),interaction were not significant(F=0.109,P=0.743).②Professional-technological group(t=-41.708,P=0.000) and service groups(t=-19.499,P=0.000) incompatible task response were greater than compatible task response.③Cognitive resources main effects were not significant(F=2.546,P=0.116),block main effects were significant(F=84.975,P=0.000),interaction was significant(F=9.714,P=0.000).Conclusion Implicit occupational stereotypes and occupational preferences exist.Professional stereotypes information processing is automated,it follows the schema filter model.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2011年第9期1071-1073,共3页
China Journal of Health Psychology