摘要
2009年11月25日以来丰田汽车召回事件备受关注,这一事件反映出仅仅依靠汽车厂商的自觉性来保障汽车召回的有效实施是不够的。在政府、消费者、汽车厂商对汽车安全缺陷的认定存在争议时,中立检测机构能起到关键的作用。本文从汽车召回流程出发,对比了中日汽车召回流程的差异,相关检测机构特点和作用的不同,发现中国的汽车召回检测机构在中立性和权威性方面存在的问题,并以此提出改善建议。
Since November 25,2009,Toyota＇s auto recall has been concerned by the public.This incident reflects the fact that relying on auto makers＇ self-consciousness to guarantee the effective auto recall is just not enough.Testing organizations with a neutral position could play a key role,when government,consumers,and auto makers have the disagreements on the safety defects.By comparing auto recall processes between China and Japan,the processes differences,characteristics differences,and roles of testing organizations related to the auto recall,as well as the problems involving neutrality and authority of the testing organizations in China are found.Some recommendations for improving the testing organizations in China have been proposed.
出处
《科研管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第10期151-160,共10页
Science Research Management
基金
北京市委科科软科学课题(Z07020600290793)
国家自然科学基金(70371001
70621061
70831003)
关键词
汽车召回
检测机构
安全监管
auto recall
testing organization
safety supervision system
