美国司法审查制度产生的正当性基础——对马伯里诉麦迪逊一案的前提性追问

On Justifiable Bases of American Judicial Review System——Precise Examination on the Case of Marbury v. Madison

马伯里诉麦迪逊一案被学界公认为美国司法审查的先例,并因此成为学者们讨论美国司法审查的切入点。然而,马伯里案的发生并不是一种巧合,而是美国宪政的必然结果。事实上,在马伯里案之前,美国司法审查制度的产生就已经具备各种条件。具体而言,宪政思想为美国司法审查制度的产生奠定了思想根基,宪政实践为美国司法审查制度的产生树立了历史典范,而宪政法律则为美国司法审查制度的产生提供了法律依据。

The case of Marbury v.Madison is recognized as the precedent of Amecican judicial review in the educational world,which becomes the breakthrough point when scholars discuss American judicial review.However,the occurrence of Marbury case isn＇t a kind of coincidence.It is the inevitable result of American constitutionalism.As a matter of fact,the production of American judicial review system has met each kind of requirement before Marbury case.The constitutionalism thoughts have laid the foundation of thought for the production of American judicial review system.The practice of constitutionalism has set up historical models for the production of American judicial review system.And constitutionalism laws have provided legal bases for the production of American judicial review system.