期刊文献+

大学生焦虑抑郁情绪心理干预效果评价研究 被引量:4

Study on the Evaluation of Psychological Intervention to Reduce Anxiety and Depression of College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用焦虑自评量表(SA S)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)结合大学生心理调查量表和大学生的人口学信息编制而成调查问卷,对某市属高校大学新生和大学二三年级学生的焦虑抑郁心理状况进行调查研究。调查表的数据应用Ep idata 3.02软件,采用双人、双机录入。运用SPSS软件进行统计学分析,对单因素进行卡方检验,多因素Log istic回归分析。结果发现干预组与对照组比较焦虑情绪改善明显。干预组新生的抑郁情绪改善明显,而大学二三年级学生的抑郁情绪改善不明显。 The questionnaire of the research is designed on the basis of SAS, SDS, the College Students' Psychological Scale and the demographic information of college students. Based on the above questionnaire, the research has been conducted on the anxiety and depression of freshmen, sophomores, juniors and graduates of a municipal university. The data has been input by two people with Epidata 3.02 software, and are analyzed with chi-square tests, t-test, analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analysis of SPSS. The findings show anxiety of the intervention group is better than the control group. Anxiety of the intervention group of freshmen has been improved more than the control group. Anxiety of the intervention group of graduates, sophomores and juniors are not improved any more.
作者 蒋霞
出处 《金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第3期10-14,共5页 Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 大学生 焦虑抑郁情绪 心理干预 效果评价 college students anxiety and depression psychological intervention evaluation results
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献25

共引文献1013

同被引文献43

  • 1刘贤臣,唐茂芹,彭秀桂,陈琨,戴郑生.焦虑自评量表SAS的因子分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1995,21(6):359-360. 被引量:195
  • 2罗艳丰,何朝阳,杨福,陈冉,陈江,史太平.焦虑自评量表对医学硕士研究生的测量结果及因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2006,33(12):2304-2306. 被引量:46
  • 3Kurt K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of sornatic symptoms. Psychosom Med, 2002 ; 64(2) 258-266.
  • 4Vroege L, Hoedeman R, Nuyen J, et al. Validation of the PHQ-15 for somatoform disorder in the occupational health care setting. J Occup Rehabil,201222(1):51-58.
  • 5van Ravesteijn H, Wittkampf K, Lucassen P, et al. Detecting somatoform disorders in primary care with the PHQ15. Ann Fam Med, 2009 7(3) : 232-238.
  • 6Lee S, Ma LY, Tsang A. Psychometric properties of the Chinese 15-item patient health questionnaire in the general population of Hong Kong. J Psychosom Res, 2011 ; 71 (2) ; 69- 73.
  • 7Li F, Green JG, Kessler RC, et al. Estimating prevalence of serious emotional disturbance in schools using a brief screening scale [J]. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 2010, 19 Suppl 1 (1) : 88-98.
  • 8Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber M J, et al. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative[J]. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 2010, 19 Suppl 1 (1): 4-22.
  • 9Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Slade T, et al. The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being[J]. Psychol Med, 2003, 33 (2): 357-362.
  • 10Wittchen HU. Screening for serious mental illness: methodological studies of the K6 screening scale[J]. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 2010, 19Suppl 1 (1): 1-3.

引证文献4

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部