期刊文献+

基于技术成熟困难度的航天型号研制风险管理方法 被引量:7

A R&D Risk Management Method of Weapon Based on Advancement Degree of Difficulty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析航天型号存在的各种研制风险,指出技术风险是最根本性和最重要的研制风险,但目前的技术风险管理多数是基于定性评价的管理方法,以传统的专家经验为主。本文提出了一种以技术成熟困难度评估为基础的技术风险评估框架和方法,将分级量化和相对规范的技术成熟度、技术成熟困难度和技术关键度引入风险评估的过程,通过技术成熟困难度和技术风险评估结果,指导型号设计师系统开展技术攻关策划和指挥系统实施技术风险管理。该方法针对不同技术成熟度等级之间的跨越难度,将定性与定量的方法相结合,具有动态性好、适应性广的特征,可以贯穿航天型号整个研制周期实施风险管理,有着较强的针对性和实用性。 By analyzing a variety of R&D risk of weapons, it indicates that technical risk is the fundamental and paramount development risk. Most of today' s technology risk management is based on the qualitative assessment of risk management according to the traditional expertise. An assessment framework of technology risk based on the advancement degree of difficulty assessment is presented. The technology maturity,the advancement degree of difficulty and the technology critical value are introduced to technology risk assessment process. Through the assessment results of advancement degree of difficulty and technology risk, the technical command system is guided to implement technology risk management and designer system is guided to carry out the R&D of key technology. According to the gaps between different technology maturity levels, the method is developed by combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches, which is dynamic and adaptable. The method can be used throughout the risk management of entire development cycle of aerospace project and has a strong relevance and practicality.
出处 《航天控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期77-81,共5页 Aerospace Control
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(项目代码:90818024) 国家"863"计划项目资助(项目代码:2009AA01Z433 2009AA010313)
关键词 技术成熟度 技术成熟困难度 航天型号研制 风险管理 Technology maturity Advancement degree of difficulty R&D of weapon Risk management
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1傅鸿源.工程项目风险评价方法的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(10):55-58. 被引量:59
  • 2尹贻林,陈通,杨彬.我国项目风险管理的发展趋势[J].中国软科学,1995(10):81-84. 被引量:24
  • 3陈文光,雨田.阿里安5首飞失利与航天产业的高风险[J].导弹与航天运载技术,1996(5):70-74. 被引量:1
  • 4杨建平,杜端甫.重大工程项目风险管理中的综合集成方法[J].中国管理科学,1996,4(4):24-28. 被引量:29
  • 5[3]FENG Shan,GUO Sihai,LI Xiaodong.The fuzzy technological framework for a web-based decision support system[C]//Proceedings of the 11th World Multi-Conference on Systems,Cybernetics and Informatics.Orlando,2007:7-11.
  • 6[4]CHAI Xudong,LI Bohu.Research and application on service oriented infrastructure for networkitized M&S[C]//Proceedings of 2006 International Workshop on Distributed Simulation on the Grid.Washington,DC,USA,2006:113-125.
  • 7[5]FRANK M V.Choosing among safety improvement strategies:discussion with example of risk assessment and multi-criteria decision approaches for NASA[J].Reliability Engineering and System,1995,49:311-324.
  • 8[9]SHIM J P,WARKENTIN M.Past,present,and future of decision support technology[J].Decision Support Systems,2002,33(2):111-126.
  • 9[10]HEMANT K,DANIEL J.Progress in web-based decision support technologies decision support systems[J].Decision Support Systems,2007,43(4):1083-1095.
  • 10[11]MUSTAJOKI J,RAIMO P.Interactive computer support in decision conferencing:two cases on off-site nuclear emergency management[J].Decision Support Systems,2007,42(4):2247 -2260.

共引文献45

同被引文献60

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部