摘要
关于大柴胡汤证的归属,目前的主流观点是少阳阳明合病或少阳病合并里实证,但细究其详,笔者认为该观点的支持论据并不充分,其推理逻辑亦存可推敲之处。而通过对柯琴诸论述与《伤寒论》原文的对比考证,笔者从阳明经证的实质出发,推断大柴胡汤证不可归于阳明里实证,而应归于少阳气分实热证的范畴,并由此辅以其他论据推断大柴胡汤是否有大黄一药当存疑。
In the mainstream opinion,Dachaihu syndrome is a syndrome combination of Shaoyang and Yangming.In this paper,the author doubted rationality of this viewpoint by reading through relative content.Through the comparative research on discussion of Cold-Induced Disorders and KE Qin's annotation,the author concluded that Dachaihu syndrome is excessive-heat syndrome in Shaoyang Qi stage and rhubarb is not the original component of Dachaihu Decoction.
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第10期2434-2436,共3页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
柯琴
大柴胡汤
六经证
大黄
KE Qin
Dachaihu Decoction
Six-meridian syndrome differentiation
Rhubarb