从修辞角度看民事案件律师代理人辩论词的信息发展

Analyzing the Court Debates of Lawyer Agents Ad Litem in Civil Cases from the Perspective of Rhetoric

本文以我国目前非律师强制代理制度所面临的困境为切入点,从修辞和语篇信息角度,把法庭辩论中常用的修辞学三种说服手段即逻辑诉诸、人格诉诸和情感诉诸嫁接到树状信息结构中,对四个无律师代理的民事案件庭审语篇的辩论词部分进行了分析,找出了非律师代理人的辩论词在修辞方面存在的问题,并提出相关建议。希望能提高民事案件中非律师代理人法庭辩论的修辞意识,从而促进语言层面的庭审公正。

According to the Civil Procedure Law of the People＇s Republic of China, the agent ad litem doesn＇t necessar- ily have to be a lawyer, which induces some problems in the trial in court. From the perspectives of information and rhetoric, this paper analyzes the court debates of four civil cases in which at least one of the parties do not appoint any lawyer as his/her agent ad litem. Then, some problems and implications are specified. It is hoped that this paper can raise the awareness of nonlawyer agents ad litem in terms of rhetoric, and in turn can enhance the justice in the trial in court.