期刊文献+

美国“分割赔偿金”制度探析

On American Split-Recovery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "分割赔偿金"是美国惩罚性赔偿改革的措施之一,主要用于克服原告为了获得巨额赔偿金而滥用司法程序的弊端,其可产生提高司法系统效率、促进双方当事人进行和解等效果,但遭受到来自美国宪法修正案等方面的质疑。同时,该制度的诞生引发了美国重新解读惩罚性赔偿的热潮。 "Split-recovery" is one of the measures to reform the American punitive damages, it is mainly used to overcome the shortcomings that the plaintiff abuses the judicial procedures, and the "split-recovery" can improve the efficiency of the judicial system and the success rate of reconciliation, but it has been questioned by the United States Constitutional Amendments, and so on. Meanwhile, this system is a re-interpretation of the punitive damages.
作者 陈越鹏
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《韶关学院学报》 2011年第9期45-47,共3页 Journal of Shaoguan University
关键词 惩罚性赔偿 制度改革 分割赔偿金 punitive damages reform split-recovery
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1KIMBERLY A. Recalibrating the Scales of Justice through National Punitive Damage Reform[J]. American University Law Review, 1997(46): 1573-1638.
  • 2MATTHEW J. Split-Recovery Statutes: the Interplay of the Taking and Excessive Fines Clauses[J]. Cornell Law Review, 1994(80):104- 157.
  • 3DODSON S. Assessing the Practicality and Constitutionality of Alaska's Split-Recovery Punitive Damages Statute[J]. Duke Law Journal, 2000(49):1335-1369.
  • 4LEAH R. Mervine, Bridging the "Philosophical Void" In Punitive Damages: Empowering Plaintiffs and Society through Curative Damages[J].Buffalo Law Review , 2007(54):1587-1638.
  • 5PATRICK W. The Practical Effects of Spilt-Recovery Statutes and Their Validity as a Tool of Modem Day "Tort Reform" [J]. Drake Law Review, 2002(50):593-610.
  • 6PAUL B. Rietema Reconceptuedizing Split-Recovery Statutes: Philip Morris USA v. Williams 127 S. Ct. 1057(2007). Harvard Jour- ned of Law & Public Policy, 2008(31):1159-1168.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部