医学人文社科论文摘要写作评析——以《医学与哲学》杂志部分论文为例

Analysis on Abstract Writing of Medical Humanities and Social Science Papers:Take the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy as An Example

明确学术论文摘要编写规范的基础上,以《医学与哲学》(人文社会医学版)部分论文为基础,辨析医学人文社科论文摘要写作常见的使用主语称谓和主观性评论、将常识性内容写入摘要或过多介绍他人成果、使用非规范用语和冗词等错误,提出应依据实证型、述评型、理论探索型研究的特点规范摘要写作,以提高论文质量,促进成果交流。

Based on explicating the norms of abstract writing, it took some papers from Humanistic and Social Medicine E-dition of Journal of Medicine and Philosophy as examples, analyzing the common errors of abstract writing, such as the u sing subject title and subjective comments, introducing common sense or excessively describing results of others＇ research, using non--standardized terminology and verbiage. In order to improve the papers quality, and promote exchange of the achievements, it proposed that the abstract writing should be standardized according to the characteristics of different types of studies, such as evidence--based, review and theory--based research.