1Gille O, Jolivet E, Dousset V, et al. Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32 (11): 1236-1241.
2Motosuneya T, Asazuma T, Tsuji T, et al. Postoperative change of the cross-sectional area of back musculature after 5 surgical procedures as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2006, 19(5): 318-322.
3Cloward RB. The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg, 1953, 10(2): 154-168.
4Harms JG, Jeszensky D. The unilateral, transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Traumatol, 1998, 6: 88-99.
6Hee HT, Castro FP Jr, Majd ME, et al. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar nterbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord, 2001, 14(6): 533-540.
7Villavicencio A, Burneikiene S, Roeca C, et al. Percutaneous versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: safety and outcome. Proceedings of the NASS 21st Annual Meeting, 2006.
8Peng CW, Yue WM, Tan SB. Clinical outcome of minimally inva- sire versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Proceedings of the NASS 22nd Annual Meeting, 2007. Dohmen H,.
9Scheufler KM, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery, 2007, 60(4 Suppl 2): S203-213.
10Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN et al. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J, 2006, 6(1): 78-85.
