期刊文献+

交锁髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效研究 被引量:10

Treatment of humerus surgical neck fracture with interlocking intramedullary nail versus locking plate
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨交锁髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的近期疗效。方法对2003年1月至2008年6月应用交锁髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗的36例肱骨近端骨折患者进行回顾性研究,男11例,女25例;年龄26~78岁,平均60.3岁。根据治疗方法不同分为交锁髓内钉组(21例)与锁定钢板组(15例)。按Neer分型:交锁髓内钉组:Ⅱ型6例,Ⅲ型13例,Ⅳ型2例;锁定钢板组:Ⅱ型4例,Ⅲ型8例,Ⅳ型3例。记录切口长度、手术时间、出血量,观察骨折愈合时间、功能恢复,并进行统计学分析。结果所有患者术后获6~24个月(平均15.3个月)随访,两组平均切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),两组骨折平均愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),肩关节功能恢复交锁髓内钉组优于锁定钢板组,比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论交锁髓内钉和锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折均可获得较好效果,但交锁髓内钉固具有创伤小、操作简易的优点,是一种值得推广的治疗方法。 Objective To compare efficacy between the interlocking intramedullary nail and the locking plate in the treatment of humerus surgical neck fractures. Methods From January 2003 through June 2008, 36 patients with humerus surgical neck fracture were randomized into an interlocking intramedullary nail group (21 cases) and a locking plate group (15 cases). They were 11 males and 25 females, with an average age of 60. 3 years (range, 26 to 78 years). According to the Neer system, there were 6 cases of type Ⅱ, 13 cases of type Ⅲ and 2 cases of type Ⅳ in the nail group, while there were 4 cases of type Ⅱ, 8 cases of type m and 3 cases of type Ⅳ in the plate group. The data of wound length, operative time, intra-operative blood loss, fracture healing time and functional recovery were recorded and analyzed statistically. Results The follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 24 months (average, 15.3 months) . There were significant differences between the 2 groups( P 〈 0. 05) in wound length, operative time and intra-operative blood loss, but the average fracture healing time was not significantly different between the groups( P 〉 0.05) . The functional recovery was better in the intramedullary nail group than in the locking plate group but with no significance( P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion Although both theinterlocking intramedullary nail and the locking plate are similarly effective in the treatment of humerus surgical neck fractures, the former has an advantage in operative invasion and manipulative simplicity.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2011年第10期937-939,共3页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 肱骨骨折 近端 骨折固定术 治疗效果 Humeral fractures, proximal Fracture fixation, internal Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1970, 52: 1077-1089.
  • 2Kazakos K, Lyras DN, Galanis V, et al. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the Polarus intramedullary nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2007, 127: 503-508.
  • 3Fjalestad T, Hole Mφ, Jφrgensen JJ, et al. Health and costconsequences of surgicalversus conservative treatment for a comminutcd proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. Injury, 2010, 41: 599-605.
  • 4Helmy N, Hintermann B. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006(442): 100-108.
  • 5刘岩,曹振羽,郭永飞,陈爱民,苟三怀,欧阳跃平,张伟.锁定钢板在治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(12):947-948. 被引量:20
  • 6黄海晶,庞贵根,张铁良,张亚非,张涛.锁定钢板治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折的临床分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2008,16(18):1364-1366. 被引量:43
  • 7Rajasekhar C, Ray PS, Bhamra MS. Fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2001, 10: 7-10.
  • 8Adedapo AO, Ikpeme JO. The results of internal fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. Injury, 2001, 32: 115-121.
  • 9Agel J, Jones CB, Sanzone AG, et al. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with Polarus nail fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2004, 13: 191-195.
  • 10Jeffrey K, Grant B, Robert D, et al. A biomechanical comparison of locking plate and locking nail implants used for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16: 362-366.

二级参考文献12

  • 1黄强,王满宜,荣国威.复杂肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(3):159-164. 被引量:198
  • 2Wijgman A J, Roolker W,Patt TW.et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) ,2002,11:1919 - 1925.
  • 3Bjorkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V,et al. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate:a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year [ J ]. Aeta Orthop Scand ,2004,75:741 - 745.
  • 4Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G,et al. A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2005,430 : 176 - 181.
  • 5Ahmad M,Nanda R, Bajwa AS,et al. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate:when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability [ J ]. Injury, 2007,3 : 358 - 364.
  • 6Lill H,Hepp P,Korner J,et al. Proximal humeral fractures:how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new im- plants in human specimens [ J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2003, 123:74 - 81.
  • 7Hall JA,Phieffer LS, Mckee MD,et al. Humer shaft split fracture a- round proximal locking plates: a report of two cases [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2006,20 : 710 - 714.
  • 8Michael J,Gardner MD,Matthew H,et al. Hybrid locked plate of osteoporotic fractures of the humerus [ J 1. J Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) ,2006,88 : 1962 - 1967.
  • 9张作君,张传礼,郭淑菊,王俊颀,边涛,昌中孝,杨林平,李跃先.肱骨近端粉碎骨折的选择治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2000,7(6):614-615. 被引量:36
  • 10巫伟东,詹伟彦,何开正,邱华文,黄醒中.锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端复杂骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2003,11(22):1526-1528. 被引量:47

共引文献61

同被引文献92

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部