摘要2011年7月29日,美国联邦巡回上诉法院对分子病理学协会等诉美国专利商標局等（Association for Molecular pathology,et al.V.U.S.Patent and Trademark Office,et al.）一案作出裁定,认为已分离DNA分子具有可专利性,可以申请专利保护。此项判决推翻了美国纽约南区地方法院一年前作出的一审裁定。
2Jennifer Vogel.Patenting DNA:Balancing the Need to Incentivize Innovation in Biotechnology with the Need to Make High-Quality Genetic Testing Accessible to Patients[J].Kansas Law Review,2012(61):257-293.
3Joseph S.Classe.Genes and the Supremes:Will the Supreme Court Uphold Patents for Isolated Gene Se-quences? [J].Texas Tech Law Review,2013(45):533-564.
4Sethr Ogden.The Federal Circuit's Decision In Myri-ad.Isolated DNA Molecules Are Patentable Subject Matter[J].American University Law Review,2011(2):442-455.
5Richard Marsh.The Defendants:An Interview with Richard Marsh of Myriad Genetics[EB/OL].(2010-10-12)[2010-10-26].GENEWATCH,Oct.htp://is-suu.com/genewatchmagazine/docs/genewatch23-5.
6Carl Shapiro.Navigating the Patent Thicket:Cross Li-censes,PatentPools,and Standard-setting [M]//A dam B Jaffe.Innovation Policy and the Economy Vo-hune 1.Massachusetts:MIT Press,2001:119-150.
7Chris Holman,Will Gene Patents Impede Whole Ge-nome Sequencing?Deconstructing the Myth that 20% ofthe Human Genome is Patented[EB/OL].(2013-08-05)[2013-11-15].Holman's Biotech IP Blog,Aug.http://holmansbiotechipblog,blogspot,com/2011/08/will-gene-patents-impede-whole-genome.Html.
8Donna M.Gitter.International Conflicts over Paten-ting Human DNA Sequences in the United States and the European Union An Argument for Compulsory Licensing and a Fair-Use Exemption [J].New York Univercity Law Review,2001(6):1623-1679.
10KRAUSS J, TOSHIKO TAKENAKA. A special rule for compound protection for DNA - sequences impact of the ECJ Monsanto" decision on patent practice [ J ]. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Socie- ty, 2011, 93 (2): 189-206.
