期刊文献+

元和明前期南北差异的博弈与整合发展 被引量:35

Gaming and the Process of Integrating Differences between Northern and Southern China during the Yuan and Early Ming Dynasties
原文传递
导出
摘要 元朝统一后,南方与北方差异依然存在,导致国家制度层面亦呈现南、北因素的并存博弈。由于元政权北制因素势力过分强大,北方制度向江南的推广移植明显多于南制因素的保留及北上影响,初次博弈整合的结果,北制因素稳居上风。元明鼎革,承袭元朝制度颇多,朱元璋、朱棣的个人因素与社会关系等力量的交互作用,致使明前期南、北制因素的那次整合仍然是北制多占优势。明中叶后又实施另一次整合,且改为南制占主导。先后经历元朝、明前期以北制为主导和明中叶后南制为主导的三次整合,明后期才重新回归到代表唐宋变革成果的南制方面且得以升华发展。此乃元明二代因南、北差异而展现的社会整合发展的基本脉络和走势。就社会形态的核心——社会关系而言,主从隶属依附,大抵是北制的要害;租佃雇佣,大抵是南制的真谛。 The unification of China in the Yuan dynasty did not eliminate the differences between northern and southern China,leading to the co-existence of and gaming between the northern and southern elements at the level of state institutions.During the Yuan dynasty,the expansion and transplantation of northern institutions to the southern region were more obvious than the reverse due to the strength of northern elements in the government,so that the first of these games ended with the northern elements securely gaining the upper hand.After the Yuan was replaced by the Ming,the latter inherited many of the former's institutions,and this,in addition to the interaction of a variety of forces,such as the personal factors of Emperor Zhu Yuanzhang and Emperor Zhu Di as well as their relations with society,meant that institutional integration during the early years of the Ming dynasty was still dominated by the northern side.Later,in the middle of the Ming dynasty,a new integration was obtained,but this time it was with the southern elements dominant.It was not until the late Ming dynasty,after the three integrations mentioned above,that the southern institutions representing the results of the reforms of the Tang and Song dynasties were finally recovered and further developed.This was the basic course of the development of the social integration of the differences between the north and the south during the Yuan and Ming dynasties.From the perspective of the central issue in social formations-social relations,the main essence of the northern system was the patron-client relationship,as that in the south was the tenancy and hired employee relationship.
作者 李治安
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期59-77,190-191,共19页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1单庆.《至元嘉禾志》卷6《户口》,《宋元方志丛刊》,第5册,第4452页.
  • 2冯福京.《大德昌国州图志》卷3《叙赋·户口》,《宋元方志丛刊》,第6册,第6078页.
  • 3虞集.《道园类稿》卷42《昔里哈剌襄靖公神道碑》,《元人文集珍本丛刊》,台北:新文丰出版公司,1985年,第6册,第277页.
  • 4张铉.《至正金陵新志》卷8《民俗志·户口》,《宋元方志丛刊》,北京:中华书局,1990年,第6册,第5642-5646页.
  • 5张铉.《至正金陵新志》卷8《民俗志·户口》.宋元方志丛刊.
  • 6黄清连.《元代户计的划分及其政治经济地位》[J].国立台湾大学历史系学报,1975,(2).
  • 7赵孟頫.《松雪斋集》附《大元故翰林学士承旨荣禄大夫知制诰兼修国史赵公行状》,《海王邮古籍丛刊》本,北京:中国书店,1991年,第4a-b、7b页.
  • 8赵承禧等编撰.《宪台通纪》,《加脱欢答剌罕大夫散官》,王晓欣点校,杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2002年,第63-64页.
  • 9萧启庆.《中国近世前期南北发展的歧异与统合-以南宋金元时期的经济社会文化为中心》,《元代的族群文化与科举》,台北:联经出版事业公司,2008年,第1-22页.
  • 10姚燧.《牧庵集》卷28《南京路总管张公墓志铭》,《四部丛刊初编》,上海:商务印书馆,1919年,第1432册,第5a-b页.

二级参考文献37

共引文献144

同被引文献504

引证文献35

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部