基于课程标准的学业成就评价:韦伯模式之研究被引量：18

Webb Model of Alignment between Academic Achievement Assessment and Curriculum Standards

导出

摘要学业成就评价必须基于课程标准,这是国家对基础教育整体质量卓越的诉求。韦伯博士是美国"基于标准的评价"运动的重要代表人物,他提出了学业成就评价与课程标准保持一致性的分析维度、分析程序、分析方法等一整套一致性框架,并开发了基于网络的评价与标准一致性工具。全面深入研究韦伯模式,对我国基础教育阶段学生学业成就评价改革具有重要意义。 Academic achievement assessment must be standards - based, and it must embody the high expectation of the nation and society. This article introduced the prominent works of Webb N. L. , who is one of the most famous researchers on the alignment between assessment and standards, focusing on the Webb Alignment Tools composed of alignment criteria, alignment procedure and alignment methods. At last, the author argued in china we must understand Webb＇ s studies impersonally in the New Curriculum Reform.

作者岳喜腾张雨强

机构地区临沂大学费县分校教育部基础教育课程研究曲阜师范大学中心

出处《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第10期79-85,共7页 Global Education

基金教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"开放性学业成就评价与课程标准的匹配度研究"(07JC880007)研究成果

关键词韦伯模式课程标准学业成就评价基于标准评价与标准一致性 Webb Model alignment between standards and assessment curriculum standards academic achievement assessment standards - based

分类号 G423 [文化科学—课程与教学论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Glatthom, A. A. (1997). The Principal as Curriculum Leader. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin :83 - 89.
2崔允漷,夏雪梅.试论基于课程标准的学生学业成就评价[J].课程．教材．教法,2007,27(1):13-18. 被引量：90
3Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (CCSSO and NISE Research Monograph No. 6 ). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. 14 - 21,9,10,13,6.
4Baxter, G. P. , Shavelson, R. J. , et al. (1993). Mathematics performance assessment: Technical quality and diverse student impact. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24 (3) : 190 -216.
5Webb, N. L. (2002). Alignment study in language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies of state standards and assessments for four states. Washington, DC : CCSSO. 5 - 6.
6Webb, N. L. (2007). Issues Related to Judging the Alignmerit of Curriculum Standards and Assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20 ( 1 ) : 7 - 25.
7Porter, A. C. et al. (2007). Alignment as a Teacher Variable. Applied Measurement in Education, 20( 1 ) :27 - 51.
8Webb Alignment Tool. http://www, wcer. wisc. edu/WAT/index. aspx. 2008 - 08 - 06.
9Webb, N. , et al. (2006). Alignment of Mathematics State - level Standards and Assessments: The Role of Reviewer Agreement. CSE Report 685:22.
10Webb, N. L. ( 2005 ). Alignment, Depth of Knowledge, & Change. Florida educational research association 50th annual meeting. Miami, Florida. November 17. http://faestaff, wcer. wisc. edu/normw/. 2007 - 11 - 18.

二级参考文献10

1教育部.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)[Z].,2001..
2Robert Rothman, Jean B. Slattery, and Jennifer L. Vranek. 2002. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing. CSE Technical Report 566 [DB/OL]. http://www, cse. ucla. edu.
3Stephen Chappuis, Richard Stiggins, Judith Arter, and Jan Chappuis. Assessment For Learning. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute [E]. 2005.
4Mien Segers, Filip Dochy and Educardo Cascallar. Optimising New Models of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards [Z]. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2003. 3.
5No Child Left Behind Issue Brief: A Guide to Standards-based Assessment 2000 [DB/OL]. http:// www. ecs. org/ clearinghouse.
6Goals 2000: Educate America Act[DB/OL]. http:// www. ed. gov/ Legislation/Goals 2000/The Act.
7Hansche. Meeting the Requirements of Title I: Handbook for the development of Performances Standards [Z]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief States School Officers. 1998.
8Robert Rothman, Jean B Slat tery, Jennifer L Vranek. Benchmarking and Alignment of Stand- ards and Testing [ Z]. CSE Technical Report 566. 2002.
9Council of Chief State School Officers.Alignment Analysis and Assistance toERIC. 2002. Models forStates [Z].
10Webb N L. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States [Z]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. 1999.