期刊文献+

术中肌电图监测在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的应用

Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨术中肌电图监测在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中应用的可行性和临床疗效。方法 2008年2月~2009年10月对16例行微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合治疗的患者进行术中肌电图监测,共18个节段,66枚椎弓根螺钉。椎管减压和椎间植骨融合时应用自发肌电图监测,经皮置入椎弓根螺钉时应用电刺激诱发肌电图监测。患者术后均行CT检查螺钉位置。结果所有患者在减压过程中无异常肌电反应,2例在置入椎间融合器后出现间断性自发肌电活动。23枚螺钉﹙34.8%﹚在置入开路锥的过程中,相应的监测肌肉引出至少1次有意义的肌电活动。3枚攻丝尾部检测〈10mA,取出调整后重新置入。术后均无新的神经并发症。术后CT提示上述3个椎弓根皮质骨内侧破裂和1枚穿破外侧皮质骨。结论术中EMG监测在微创TLIF中是一种监测神经根功能的有效手段。 Objective To determine the effectiveness and clinical result of intraoperative electromyography fusion EMG )moni- toring during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ( TLIF ). Methods Between Feb 2008 and Oct 2009, 16 consecutive patients ( 18 levels, 66 pedicles )who underwent minimally invasive TLIF received intraoperative EMG monitoring. Spontaneous EMG monitoring was performed during decompression and interbody graft placement. Stimulus-evoked EMG monitoring was performed during the placement of the pedicle access needle, testing of the pedicle tap and screw. All patients underwent postoperative computed tomography ( CT ) scanning. Results In no patient did the authors observe significant EMG activation during decompression. Intermittent nerve root firing was noted after the inter- body graft was placed in two cases. Using the active stimulation protocol, 23 C 34.8% )of screw placements required one or more changes to the trajectory of the pedicle access needle. 3 ( 4.5% )pedicle taps induced EMG thresholds〈10mA, prompting repositioning. After surgery, no new neurologic deficits were found in all patients. Postoperative computed tom- ography ( CT )scanning revealed three cases ofpedicle medially breach and one case laterally. Conclusion Intraoperative nerve root monitoring is a useful adjunct to minimally invasive TLIF.
出处 《生物骨科材料与临床研究》 CAS 2011年第5期26-30,共5页 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Materials and Clinical Study
关键词 神经监测 肌电图 微创 经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合 Neurophysiologic monitoring Electromyography Minimally invasive surgery Transforaminal lumbar in-terbody fusio
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Harms J,Rolinger H.A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses:dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl).ZOrthop lhre Grenzgeb,1982,120343-347.
  • 2Peng CW,Yue WM,Poh SY,et al.Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Spine,2009,34:1385-1389.
  • 3Kotil K,Bilge T.Accuracy of pedicle and mass screw placement in the spine without using fluoroscopy:a prospective clinical study.Spine J,2008,8:591-596.
  • 4Choi WW,Green BA,Levi AD.Computer-assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion.Neurosurgery,2000,47:872-878.
  • 5Duffy MF,Phillips JH,Knapp DR,et al.Usefulness of electromyography compared to computed tomography scans in pedicle screw placement.Spine,2010,35:43-48.
  • 6Bolger C,Kelleher MO,McEvoy L,et al.Electrical conductivity measurement:a new technique to detect iatrogenic initial pedicle perforation.Eur Spine J,2007,16:1919-1924.
  • 7Welch WC,Rose RD,Balzer JR,et al.Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation:a prospective study.J Neurosurg,1997,87:397-402.
  • 8Toleikis JR,Skelly JP,Carlvin AO,et al.The usefulness of electrical stimulation for assessing pedicle screw placements.J Spinal Disord,2000,13:283-289.
  • 9Darden BV 2nd,Wood KE,Hatley MK,et al.Evaluation of pedicle screw insertion monitored by intraoperative evoked electromyography.J Spinal Disord,1996,9:8-16.
  • 10Owen JH.The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity.Spine,1999,24:2649-2662.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fixation in 148 cases. Acta Orthop Scand, 1999, 70:329-334.
  • 2Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, et al. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusions: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine, 1997, 22:2813-2822.
  • 3Welch WC, Rose RD, Balzer JR, et al. Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study. J Neurosurg, 1997, 87:397-402.
  • 4Darden BV 2nd, Wood KE, Hatley MK, et al. Evaluation of pedicle screw insertion monitored by intraoperative evoked electromyography. J Spinal Disord, 1996, 9:8-16.
  • 5Owen JH. The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity. Spine, 1999, 24:2649-2662.
  • 6Brown RH, Nash CL, Berilla JA, et al. Cortical evoked potential monitoring: a system for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function. Spine, 1984, 9:256-261.
  • 7Toleikis JR, Carlvin AO, Shapiro DE, et al. The use of dermatoma evoked responses during surgical procedures that use intrapedicular fixation of the lumbosacral spine. Spine, 1993, 18:2401-2407.
  • 8Owen JH, Padberg AM, Spahr-Holland L, et al. Clinical correlation between degenerative spine disease and dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials in humans. Spine, 1991, 16:S201-S205.
  • 9Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM, et al. A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw placement with computed tomographic scan confirmation. Spine, 1995, 20:1375-1379.
  • 10Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Spendlger D, et al. Spine pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placements. Spine, 1988, 13:1012-1018.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部