期刊文献+

空间记忆的内在参照系理论及研究进展 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 内在参照系理论提出,人在记忆环境中物体位置时会先指定一个方向,以此为基础建立内在参照系进行表征,并强调这种表征方式在空间记忆中占主要地位。该理论的核心问题是内在参照方向的选择,通常采用相对位置判断和部分场景再认范式进行研究。目前研究者们主要关注各种空间因素对于内在参照系建立的影响,包括场景结构、观察视点和物体朝向等。在未来研究中,首先可以考虑采用新的实验范式继续讨论内在参照系与自我中心参照系的关系,也可引入新的空间因素以及人口学变量来探讨它们的影响,并加大脑机制方面的研究力度。
作者 李晶 张侃
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期49-54,共6页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30800304) 中国博士后科学基金(20100481162) 江苏省博士后科研资助计划(1002046C)
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
  • 2Valiquette, C. M. , & McNamara, T. P. (2007). Different mental representations for place recognition and goal localization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 676 -680.
  • 3Zhang, H. , Mou, W. , & McNamara, T. P. (2011). Spatial updating according to a fixed reference direction of a briefly viewed layout. Cognition, 119, 419 -429.
  • 4Christou, C. G. , & Bulthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 996 -1007.
  • 5Diwadkar, V. A. , & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302 -307.
  • 6Easton, R. D. , & Shall, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 483 -500.
  • 7Rock, I. (1990). The frame of reference. In I. Rock (Ed.) , The legacy of Solomon Asch: essays in cognition and social psychology ( pp. 243 -268). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • 8Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315 -320.
  • 9牟炜民,赵民涛,李晓鸥.人类空间记忆和空间巡航[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):497-504. 被引量:10
  • 10Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. , & Irwin, D. E. (1993). Frames of reference in vision and language: where is above. Cognition, 46, 223 -244.

二级参考文献67

  • 1Aichhorn, M., Perner, J., Kronbichler, M., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G. (2006). Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind? Neurolmage, 30, 1059-1068.
  • 2Amorim, M., & Stucchi, N. (1997). Viewer- and object-centered mental explorations of an imagined environment are not equivalent. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 229-239.
  • 3Amorim, M. A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: "body analogy" for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 135, 327-347.
  • 4Arzy, S., Thut, G., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., & Blanke, O. (2006), Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporo-parietal junction and extrastriate body area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8074-8081.
  • 5Blanke, O, & Mohr, C. (2005). Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin: Implications for neuro-cognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness. Brain Research Reviews, 50, 184-199.
  • 6Blanke, O., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Brugger, P., Seeck, M.,et al. (2005). Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. Journal of Neuroscience. 25. 550-557.
  • 7Carpenter, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Comparing viewer and array mental rotations in different planes. Memory & Cognition, 29, 441-448.
  • 8Cohen, M. S., Kosslyn, S. M., Breiter, H. C., Digirolamo, G. J., Thompson, W. L., Anderson, A. et al. (1996). Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation: A mapping study using functional MRI. Brain, 119, 89-100.
  • 9Creem, S. H., Wraga, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: Geometry is more important than gravity. Cognition, 81, 41-64.
  • 10Creem, S. H., Downs, T. H., Wraga, M., Harrington, G. S., Proffitt, D. R., & Downs, J. H. (2001). An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation. Cognitive, Affeetive, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1,239--249.

共引文献86

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部