摘要
目的观察浮针治疗网球肘的临床疗效。方法将50例患者随机分为浮针组和电针组,每组25例。浮针组采用浮针;电针组采用电针。比较两组患者症状和体征的改善情况。结果浮针组治愈率和总有效率分别为48%和100%,电针组治愈率和总有效率分别为24%和92%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论浮针治疗网球肘疗效明显优于电针治疗。
Objective To Investigate the clinical efficacy of superficial needling therapy for tennis elbow.Methods Fifty patients were randomly allocated to treatment and control groups,25 cases each.The treatment group received superficial needling and the control group,electroacupuncture.The therapeutic effects on the symptoms and signs were compared between the two groups.Results The cure rate and the total efficacy rate were 48% and 100%,respectively,in the treatment group and 24% and 92%,respectively,in the control group.There were statistically significant differences between the two groups（P0.05）.Conclusion The therapeutic effect of superficial needling is significantly better than that of electroacupuncture in treating tennis elbow.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2011年第10期693-694,共2页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
肱骨外上髁炎
电针
浮针
网球肘
Lateral humeral epicondylitis
Electroacupuncture
Superficial needling
