刑法类推解释如何得以进行——刑法演绎推理中的类推解释

Analogical Interpretation Put in the Process of Criminal Deductive Reasoning

类推是重要的法学思维方法,罪刑法定允许类推解释,但是禁止作为法律漏洞填补方法的"类推适用"。类推解释以不法类型为指导,在三段论演绎推理的逻辑外壳下得以进行。类推解释的关键在于就问题案例与概念核心中的特例进行比较,衡量它们在语义、目的上的相同点的重要程度,作出等值评价或反对解释。类推解释有助于解决实践中争议很大的存疑案件。

Analogy, being an important jurisprudential reasoning method, though sanctioned by the principle of nulis poens sine lege, must not be used to plug a legal loophole. Analogical interpretation is usually, in view of categories of violations, brought about in a form of syllogism deductive reasoning. The key problem lies in a comparison between the instant case and the decided test cases, while considering their similarities in se- mantics and normal purposes so as to make equivalent evaluation or inconsistent construction. Anyhow, analog- ical interpretation is conducive to solution of controversial issues in practice.