期刊文献+

社会管理视角下的公共领域

Public Sphere from the Perspective of Social Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公共领域一直受到社会学和政治学的关注。不论是阿伦特极权主义语境中的公共领域,还是哈贝马斯民主语境中的公共领域,以及后续研究者对公共领域的探讨,基本上都是在"‘国家与社会'的对立",或者说"‘国家与社会'的消极互动"之逻辑预设上展开的。但实际上,"‘国家与社会'的协作"或"‘国家与社会'的积极互动"之逻辑预设同样存在可能;基于这种逻辑预设,从社会管理的视角来看,公共领域是一种社会管理机制,它同时与国家对社会的管理域、社会对国家的管理域、国家自我管理域以及社会自我管理域相联系,发挥着社会管理功能。公共领域的建构必须从外部要素和内部要素两个方向着手;外部要素包括制度与媒体,内部要素包括公众、公共知识分子以及社会空间。就当前现实来看,中国公共领域的建构需要从上述两个方向努力。 Public sphere is always the focus of politics and sociology. Being it in Arendt's context of totalitarianism, or in Habermas' context of democracy, or in successors' discussion, it is, by and large, based on the assumption of "the opposition of 'state and society"' or "the passive interaction of 'state and society' ". Actually, the assumption of "the co-operation of 'state and society' " or "the active interaction of 'state and society'" is possible. Based on this assumption, and from the perspective of social management, public sphere is a mechanism of social management' it is associated with the state's managing field of the society, the society's managing field of the state, the state's self managing field and the society's self managing field. The construction of public sphere must be done externally and internally. The external elements include institutions and media, while the internal ones include the public, public intellectuals and social space. According to the current situation of China, the construction of public sphere needs concerted efforts from the two directions.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期41-48,共8页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 浙江省社会科学界联合会资助项目(2011XSYN32)
关键词 公共领域 社会管理 管理域 阿伦特 哈贝马斯 public sphere social management managing field Arendt Habermas
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

二级参考文献29

  • 1路风.单位:一种特殊的社会组织形式[J].中国社会科学,1989(1):71-88. 被引量:520
  • 2邓正来.《布莱克维尔政治学百科全书》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1992.第272页.
  • 3川崎修 斯日译.《阿伦特—公共性的复权》[M].河北教育出版社,2002年.第5页.
  • 4Oi, Jean C. 1992, “‘ Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China’.” World Politics 45 ( Oct. ).
  • 5Saich, Tony 2000, “Negotiating the State: the Development of Social Organizations in China.” the China Quarterly (March).
  • 6Saich, Tony 2001, Governance and Politics of China. New York:Palgrave.
  • 7Unger, Jonthan 1996, “‘Bridges’: Private Business, the Chinese Government and the Rise of New Associations.”The China Quarterly 147, September.
  • 8Unger, Jonthan & Anita Chan 1995, “China, Corporatism, and the East Asian Model.”the Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 33.
  • 9White, Gordon 1993, “Prospects for Civil Society in China: A Case Study of Xiaoshan City.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 29.
  • 10White, Gordon, Jude Howell & Xiaoyuan Shang 1996, In Search of Civil Society: Market Reform and Social Change fit Contemporary China. New York: Oxford University Press.

共引文献2567

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部