期刊文献+

高龄活体供肾移植临床研究 被引量:1

Study on elder living related donor kidney transplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨高龄活体供肾移植的安全性及临床效果。方法回顾性分析高龄活体供肾移植(60岁<供体年龄≤65岁)11例供体(A1组)、受体(A2组)临床资料,与同期开展的其他96例适龄活体供肾移植(供体年龄<60岁)供体(B1组)术后1、3、6、12月血压和24H尿蛋白定量情况及受体(B2组)在术后1、3、6、12月移植肾功能状态进行比对分析。结果术后6、12月A2组与B2组移植肾存活率分别为100%和90.9%、98.9%和95.8%,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B2组术后1、3、6、12月血肌酐指标同A2组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A1组术后1月24H尿蛋白定量和收缩压指标均较A2组增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3、6、12月尿蛋白定量和术后6、12月收缩压值在A1、A2组间差异均无统计学(P>0.05)。结论术前严格评价、术中仔细操作、术后完善随访是保证高龄活体供肾移植成功的关键,可以收到安全、有效的临床效果。 Objective To investigate the safety of elder living related donor kidney transplantation.Methods The clinical data of 11 cases of elder living related donor kidney transplantation were analyzed retrospectively,while the donors were named group A1 and the recipients were named group A2.Meanwhile,the other 96 cases of donor related kidney transplantation were enrolled as controls,while the donors were named group B1 and the recipients were named group B2.The comparison between group A and group B were studied on serum creatinine(Scr) of allografts,changes of blood pressure and urine protein of donors post transplantation.Results There were no difference had been found on survival rate and Scr level of grafts between group A2 and B2(P0.05).While,statistic difference had been found on the levels of systolic pressure and urine protein between group A1 and B1 1 month post transplantation(P0.05).Conclusions Elder Living related kidney transplantation provides safe and effective Results on recipients and grafts survival with little impacts on donors.Simultaneously,we should think cautiously of the physical evaluation before operation and the follow-up post operation.
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2011年第6期56-58,共3页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 高龄 肾移植 活体供体 Elder donor Living related donor Kidney transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kumar A, Mandhani A, Verma BS, et al. Expanding the living related donor pool in renal transplantation : use of marginal donors [J]. J Urol,2000,163 ( 1 ) :33-36.
  • 2Srivastava A, Sinha T, Varma PP, et al. Experience with marginal living related kidney donors : are they beeoming routine or are there still any doubts [J]. Urology, 2005,66 ( 5 ) :971-975.
  • 3Nyberg SL, Manivel JC, Cook ME, et al. Grandparent donor in a living related renal transplant program [J]. Clin transplant, 1997,11 (5) : 349-353.
  • 4Gabolde M, Herve C, Moulin AM. Evaluation, seleetian, and follow-up of live kidney donors:a review of current practice in French renal transplant centres [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2001,16 (7) :2048- 2052.
  • 5Neipp M, Jackobs S, Jaeger M, et al. Living kidney donors > 60 years of age:is it acceptable for the donor and recipient [ J ] Transplantation,2006,19 ( 3 ) :213-217.
  • 6Baid-Agrawal S, Frei UA. Living donor renal transplantation : recent developments and perspectives[J]. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol, 2007,3 (1) :31-41.
  • 7Koppelstaetter C ,Schratzberger G, Perco P, et al. Markers of cellular senescence in zero hour biopsies predict outcome in renal transplantation [J]. Aging Cell,2008,7 (4) :491-497.
  • 8Toronyi E, Alfoldy F, Jaray J, et al. Evaluation of the state of health of living related kidney transplantation donor[ J ]. Clin Transp, 1998,11 (2) :557-559.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部