期刊文献+

中国会计学博士点培养方案调查与评价

Investigation and Evaluation of Chinese Accounting Doctoral Programs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国会计学博士教育日益面临来自就业市场和国际竞争的压力。文章通过考察国内会计学博士培养方案的状况,运用期刊论文发表数量对会计学博士点进行排名,旨在探索能够培养出更具研究能力的博士生培养方案。研究结果发现,培养出最多具有研究能力博士生的前三名博士点分别来自上海财经大学、中国人民大学和北京大学,从培养方案来看,排名靠前的博士点在公共课部分几乎都开设了计量经济学和微观经济学。结论认为,学习美国的研究范式和哲学思想可能并不完全适合中国,在培养方案的设计上还要更多考虑中国本土的问题。 Chinese accounting doctor education is facing more and more challenges from the labor market and internationatl competition. This paper explores the accounting doctoral programs in major Chinese universities, and ranks these programs by research productivity. Our aim is to find out the program ar- rangements that may train the most productive researchers. The results show that the top three programs are from Shanghai Universilty of Finance and Economics, China People's University and Beijing University. Al- most all of the high ranked programs have courses of econometrics and micro-economics. It is also argued that the complete adoption of the Anglo-American philosophies and ideology might not be appropriate for China and the program designers should take the special demands of Chinese economy into consideration.
作者 薛清梅
出处 《上海立信会计学院学报》 北大核心 2011年第5期13-22,共10页 Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce
基金 财政部全国会计科研课题(2008KJC08) 教育部第35批留学回国人员科研启动基金
关键词 博士教育 会计学 课程设置 培养方案 期刊排名 doctor education accounting curriculum doctoral program journal ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Report of the Committee on Doctoral Programs in Accounting[ J]. The Accounting Review, 1961,36 (2) : 213 -216.
  • 2William F. Crum. 1980 survey of doctoral programs in accounting in the United States [ J]. The Accounting Review, 1981,56(3) :634 -641.
  • 3张为国,陈信元.全面展开博士生教学改革 造就跨世纪会计学术带头人[J].会计研究,1999(5):20-26. 被引量:11
  • 4Paul D. Isaac, Stephen V. Quinlan, Mindy M. Walker. Faculty perceptions of the doctoral dissertation [ J ]. The Journal of Higher Education, 1992, 63 ( 3 ) : 241 - 268.
  • 5Carpenter, Charles G. , Larry D. Crumbley and Robert H. Strawser. A new ranking of accounting faculties and doctoral programs [ J ]. The Journal of Accountancy, 1974, June :90 - 94.
  • 6Bazley, John D. and Loren A. Nikolai. A comparison of published accounting research and qualities of accounting faculty and doctoral programs [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1975 ,July :605 - 610.
  • 7Lawrence D. Brown and John C. Gardner. Applying citation analysis to evaluate the research contributions of accounting faculty and doctoral programs [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1985,60 (2) : 262 - 277.
  • 8Brown Lawrence, Laksmana Indrarini. Ranking accounting PH. D programs and faculties using social science research network downloads [ R ]. SSRN Working Paper, 2003, July.
  • 9Hasselback, Reinstein, Schwan. Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Education, 2000, 18 : 79 -97.
  • 10William W. Stammerjohan, Steven C. Hall. Evaluation of doctoral programs in accounting : an examination of placement [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Education, 2002,20 : 1 - 27.

二级参考文献7

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部