期刊文献+

多属性采购拍卖与多属性不对称纳什谈判的比较研究 被引量:1

A Comparison of Multidimensional Procurement Auction and Multidimensional Asymmetric Nash Bargaining
下载PDF
导出
摘要 拍卖与谈判作为采购中有效选择交易对象的常见方式,从最大化采购方收益的角度看,现有理论对这2种方式各有支持。通过运用经典的多属性拍卖模型和多属性不对称纳什谈判模型,将拍卖的期望收益和谈判的收益进行比较,发现2种机制的分界与谈判力量和投标人数这2个指标有关,通过划分谈判力量和投标人数取值的不同区间,找到了拍卖或谈判这2种方式的边界条件以及它们各自的适宜范围。 As common and effective ways of selecting suppliers in procurement, auction and bargaining both have their supports in the current theory, from the perspective of the purchaser. By u sing the classical multidimensional auction model in and multidimensional asymmetric Nash bargaining model, to compare the expected revenue of auction with the earnings of bargaining, it is found that the boundary of the two mechanisms relates to the power of bargaining and the number of bidders. By dividing the interval of them, the boundary conditions of auction and bargaining and their respective appropriate ranges are also found.
作者 黄河 王峰
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 2011年第11期1690-1695,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071171 70701040)
关键词 多属性采购拍卖 多属性不对称纳什谈判 机制比较 multidimensional auction multidimensional asymmetric Nash bargaining comparison of mechanisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1THOMAS C J, WILSON B J. A Comparison of Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations[J].Rand Journal of Economics, 2002,33(1) :140-155.
  • 2KJERSTAD E. Auctions vs Negotiations: A Study of Price Differentials[J]. Health Economics, 2005, 14 (12):1 239-1 251.
  • 3BAJARI P, MCMILLAN R, TADELIS S. Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement.. An Empirical Analysis[J].The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 2009, 25(2):372-399.
  • 4GOLDBERG V P. Competitive Bidding and the Production of Precontract Information[J].The Bell Journal of Economics, 1977, 8(1): 250-261.
  • 5BULOW J, KLEMPERER P. Auctions Versus Negotiations[J].The American Economic Review, 1996, 86(1): 180- 194.
  • 6戎文晋,刘树林.拍卖还是谈判:来自大宗股权交易的实证[J].统计与决策,2009,25(3):127-129. 被引量:1
  • 7He HUANG,Hongyan XU,Jian CHEN.A COMPARISON OF A SIMPLE PROCUREMENT AUCTION AND GENERALIZED NASH BARGAINING[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2009,18(3):341-357. 被引量:2
  • 8CHE Y K. Design Competition Through Multidimensional Auctions [J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1993, 24(4): 668-680.
  • 9NASH J. The Bargaining Problems[J]. Econometrica, 1950,18(1) :155-162.
  • 10穆素.讨价还价理论及其应用[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005.

二级参考文献29

  • 1徐信忠,黄张凯,刘寅,薛彤.大宗股权定价的实证检验[J].经济研究,2006,41(1):101-108. 被引量:48
  • 2Boone, A. L. and Mulherin, J. H., How Are Firms Sold [J]. The Journal of Finance, Cambridge:2007,62(2).
  • 3Bulow, J. and Klemperer, P., Auction Versus Negotiations [J]. American Economic Review, 1996,86(1).
  • 4Jarrell, G. A. and Poulsen, A. B., The Returns to Acquiring Firms in Tender Offers: Evidence from Three Decades [J]. Financial Management,1989,18(3).
  • 5Kirkegaard, R., A Short Proof of the Bulow-Klemperer Auctions vs.Negotiations result[J]. Economic Theory,2006,28(2).
  • 6McAfee, R. P. and McMillan, J., Competition and Game Theory [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1996,33(2).
  • 7Milgrom, P. R., Auction and Bidding: A Primer[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1989,3(3).
  • 8Milgrom, P. R. Weber, R. J., A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding[J]. Econometrica,1982,50(5).
  • 9Ye, L., Indicative Bidding and A Theory of Two-stage Auctions [J].Games and Economic Behavior,2007,58(1).
  • 10Admati, A.R. & Perry, M. (1987). Strategic delay in bargaining. Review of Economic Studies, 54:345-364.

共引文献4

同被引文献18

  • 1陈剑,黄河.逆向组合拍卖投标者获胜概率研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):13-19. 被引量:8
  • 2刘树林、王明喜,2009:《多属性采购拍卖理论与应用评述》,《中国科学与管理》第1期.
  • 3夏晓华、王美今,2010:《考虑情绪波动的关联价值拍卖模型研究》,《数学的实践与认知》第4期.
  • 4Campo, S. 2012. "Risk Aversion and Asymmetry in Procurement Auctions: Identification." Estimation and Application to Construction Procurements ,168 ( 1) : 96 - 1 07.
  • 5Castro, L. 1. ,and M. A. Frutos. 2010. "How to Translate Results from Auctions to Procurements." Economics Letters, 106 (2) : 115 -118.
  • 6Chen, A. S. , G. Liaw, and M. T. Leung. 2003. "Stock Auction Bidding Behavior and Information Asymmetries: An Empirical Analysis Using the Discriminatory Auction Model Framework . Journal of Banking & Finance ,27 (5) : 876 - 889.
  • 7Cramton,P. ,Y. Shoham,and R. Steinberg. 2005. Introduction to Combinatorial Auctions. Cambridge ,Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • 8Klemperer, P. 2004. Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • 9Krishna, V. 2009. Auction Theory. 2nd ed. Waltham, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
  • 10Laffont ,J. J. ,H. Ossard, and Q. E. Vuong. 1995. "Econometrics of First - price Auctions . Econometrica ,63 (4) : 953 - 980.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部