期刊文献+

故障树随机生成及变量排序 被引量:2

Random generation and variable ordering of fault tree
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对故障树分析方法性能评价研究中存在的测试基准规模和多样性问题,基于故障树样本随机生成的思想,确定了故障树6个主要结构特征,并依据这些结构特征给出了自顶向下地生成算法,包括随机树骨架生成算法和随机重复度叶子序列生成算法.通过变量排序策略性能评价给出了测试基准的示范应用.性能评价表明:深度策略(DEEP)性能远优于广度策略(WIDE);WIDE策略的优越性依赖于重复叶子节点数量;改进带权值深度策略(WDEEP)是DEEP策略的互补策略并不能够代替DEEP策略. To cope with the problems related to benchmark size and diversity for performance evaluation of fault tree analysis methods,based on the idea of random generation of fault trees,this work proposed six important structural characteristic parameters of various fault trees,a top-down generation algorithm according to these parameters,which included a random tree skeleton generation algorithm and a randomly repeated leaf sequence generation algorithm,then illustrated the benchmark application with variable ordering heuristic performance evaluation.The evaluation shows that: deep(DEEP) heuristic is far superior to the wide(WIDE) heuristic;the superiority of the WIDE heuristic depends on the number of repeated leaves in the fault tree;improved weighting deep(WDEEP) heuristic is a complementary strategy for DEEP heuristic and not able to replace it.
出处 《浙江大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1539-1543,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60903011) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20090092120030) 江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK2009267) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(Y1100689)
关键词 故障树 测试基准 变量排序 二进制决策图 fault tree benchmark variable ordering binary decision diagram
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1孙艳,杜素果.一种二元决策图底事件排序的新方法[J].系统管理学报,2008,17(2):210-216. 被引量:9
  • 2BARTLETT L M. Neural network selection mechanism for BDD construction[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2004, 20(3):217-223.
  • 3BARTLETT L M, ANDREW J D. Selecting an ordering heuristic for the fault tree to binary decision diagram conversion process using neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2002, 51(3): 344-349.
  • 4BOUISSOU M, BRUYERE F, RAUZY A. BDDbased fault tree processing: A comparison of variable ordering heuristics[C]∥Proceedings of ESREL97. Lisbon, Portugal: Pergamon Press, 1997:2045-2052.
  • 5MO Yuchang. Variable ordering to improve BDD analysis of phasedmission systems with multimode failures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2009, 58(1):53-57.
  • 6MO Yuchang. New insights into the BDDbased reliability analysis of phasedmission systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2009, 58(4):667-678.
  • 7XING L, MESHKAT L, DONOHUE S K. Reliability analysis of hierarchical computerbased systems subject to commoncause failures[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(3):351-359.
  • 8XING L. Reliability evaluation of phasedmission systems with imperfect fault coverage and commoncause failures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2007, 56(1):58-68.
  • 9SHRESTHA A,XING L. A Logarithmic binary decision diagramsbased method for multistate systems analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2008, 57(4):595-606.
  • 10TANG Z, DUGAN J B. BDDbased reliability analysis of phased mission systems with multimode failures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2006, 55(2):350-360.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[2]Bryant R E.Graph-based algorithm for boolcan function manipulation[J].IEEE Trans,1986,35:677-691.
  • 2[3]Sinnamon R M,Andrews J D.New approaches to evaluating fault trees[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,1997,58:89-96.
  • 3[4]Rauzy A.New algorithms for fault tree analysis[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1993,40:203-211.
  • 4[5]Bartlett L M,Andrews J D.An ordering heuristic to develop the binary decision diagram based on structural importance[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2001,72:31-38.
  • 5[6]Bartlett L M,Du S.New progressive variable ordering for binary decision diagram analysis of fault trees[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2005,21:413-425.
  • 6[7]Bartlett L M,Andrews J D.Comparison of two new approaches to variable ordering for binary decision diagrams[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2001,17:151-158.
  • 7周经伦,孙权.一种故障树分析的新算法[J].模糊系统与数学,1997,11(3):74-78. 被引量:16
  • 8徐亨成,张建国.基于BDD技术下的故障树重要度分析[J].电子机械工程,2003,19(6):1-3. 被引量:23

共引文献8

同被引文献29

  • 1莫毓昌,杨孝宗,刘宏伟.基于马尔科夫再生过程分析阶段任务系统的可靠性(英文)[J].宇航学报,2006,27(6):1335-1340. 被引量:2
  • 2莫毓昌,杨孝宗,崔刚,刘宏伟.一般阶段任务系统的任务可靠性分析[J].软件学报,2007,18(4):1068-1076. 被引量:6
  • 3Esary J D, Ziehms H. Reliability analysis of phased missions [ J ]. Proceedings of Reliability and Fault Tree Analysis, 1975,27:213-236.
  • 4Vesley W E. A time dependent methodology for fault tree evaluation [ J ]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1970,13 (2) :337-60.
  • 5Somani A K, Trivedi K S. Phased mission system analysis using boolean algebraic methods [ C ]//Proceedings of Sigmetrics. New York:AC, 1994:98-107.
  • 6. Ma Y, Trivedi K S. An algorithm for reliability analysis of phased-mission systems [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1999,66 (2) : 157-170.
  • 7Zang Xinyu, Sun Hairong, Trivedi K S. A BDD-based algorithm for reliability analysis of phased mission systems[ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Re- liability, 1999,48 ( 1 ) :50-60.
  • 8Rauzy A. New algorithms for fault tree analysis [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993,40 (3) :203-211.
  • 9Bollig B, Wegener I. Improving the variable ordering of OBDDs is NP-complete [ J ] IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1996,45 (9) :993-1002.
  • 10Bartlett L M, Andrews J D. Choosing a heuristic for the fault tree to binary decision diagram conversion using neural networks [ J 1. IEEE Trans- actions on Reliability,2002,51 ( 3 ) : 344 -349.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部