期刊文献+

微刺激联合拮抗剂促排卵方案在卵巢低反应患者IVF中的应用 被引量:4

Application of mini-stimulation protocol combined with ovulation induction protocol with antagonist in IVF for patients with low ovarian reaction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微刺激联合拮抗剂促排卵方案在卵巢低反应患者体外受精-胚胎移植中的应用效果。方法:回顾性分析进行IVF/ICSI助孕、应用微刺激方案的卵巢低反应患者共35个周期。根据是否联合应用拮抗剂分为两组。A组:来曲唑加HMG联合拮抗剂组共20个周期;B组:来曲唑加HMG未用拮抗剂组共15个周期。比较两组的Gn用量、平均获卵数、提前排卵周期率、受精率、可利用胚胎率、优胚率、临床妊娠率等各项指标。结果:①两组患者的平均年龄、不孕年限、基础内分泌水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②hCG注射日血清LH水平B组明显高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);hCG注射日血清E2水平、内膜厚度A组明显高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);hCG注射日血清P水平两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③A组平均获卵数显著高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。④两组之间的Gn用量、用药时间、受精率、卵裂率、移植周期率、可利用胚胎率、优胚率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑤A组临床妊娠率(36.4%)高于B组(25.0%),A组提前排卵率(10%)低于B组(40%)。结论:微刺激联合拮抗剂者的促排效果要优于未用拮抗剂者。 Objective:To explore the application effect of mini-stimulation protocol combined with ovulation induction protocol with antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) for patients with low ovarian reaction.Methods:35 cycles of the patients with low ovarian reaction who were treated with IVF/ICSI and mini-stimulation protocol were analyzed retrospectively,then they were divided into two groups according to combined with antagonist or not: group A(20 cycles treated with letrozole plus HMG combined with antagonist) and group B(15 cycles treated with letrozole plus HMG).The indexes including the doses of Gn,the average numbers of retrieved oocytes,the advanced ovulation cycle rates,the fertilization rates,the numbers of embryos suitable for embryo transfer,good quality embryo rates and clinical pregnancy rates in the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in average age,the duration of infertility and basic endocrine level between the two groups(P0.05).The serum luteinizing hormone(LH) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin(HCG) injection in group B was significantly higher than that in group A(P0.05).The serum estradiol level and the thickness of endometrium on the day of HCG injection in group A were significantly higher than those in group B(P0.05).There was no significant difference in serum progestogen level on the day of HCG injection between the two groups(P0.05).The average number of retrieved oocytes in group A was significantly higher than that in group B(P0.05).There was no significant difference in the dose of Gn,administration time,fertilization rate,cleavage rate,transplantation cycle rate,the rate of embryos suitable for embryo transfer and good quality embryo rate between the two groups(P0.05).The clinical pregnancy rate in group A was 36.4%,which was significantly higher than that in group B(25.0%),the advanced ovulation rate in group A was 10%,which was significantly lower than that in group B(40%).Conclusion:Compared with the cases without antagonist,the cases treated with mini-stimulation protocol combined with antagonist have better effect of ovulation induction.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第28期4387-4389,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 微刺激 拮抗剂 卵巢低反应 体外受精-胚胎移植 Mini-stimulation Antagonist Low ovarian reaction In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献86

  • 1钱云,刘嘉茵,冯婷,陈娟,蔡令波,冒韵东,丁卫,张燕.未成熟卵体外成熟技术在卵巢反应不良和卵泡发育迟缓周期中的应用[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(4):217-219. 被引量:6
  • 2Mitwally MF, Casper RF. The use of an aromatase inhibitor for induction of ovulation in patients with an inadequate response to clomiphene citrate[J]. Fertil Steril, 2001,75 (2):305-309.
  • 3Applebaum M. The utrine biophysical profile[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,1995,5(1) :67-68.
  • 4Kilic Okman T, Kucuk M, Altaner S, et al. Camparison of the effects of letrozole and clomiphene citrate on ovarian follicles, endometrium, and hormone levels in the rat[J].Fertil Steril, 2003,80(6) :1330-1332.
  • 5Fisher SA, Reicl RI, Vuget DA, et al. A randomized doubleblind comparison of the effects of clomiphene citrate and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on ovulatory function in normal women[J]. Fertil Steril, 2002,78(2) :280-285.
  • 6Vendola K, Zhou J, Wang J, et al. Androgens promote oocyte insuli-like growth factor 1 expression and initiation of follicle development in the primate ovary[J].Biol Reprod, 1999,61(2) :353-357.
  • 7Vendola K, Zhou J, Adesanya OO, et al. Androgens stimulate early stages of follicular growth in the primate ovary[J].J Clin Invest, 1998,101(12) :2622-2629.
  • 8Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Aromatase inhibition improves ovarian response to follicle-stimulation hormone in poor responders[J].Fertil Steril,2002,77(4):776-780.
  • 9Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Aromatasc inhibition reduces gonadotrophin dose required for controlled ovarian stimulation in women with unexplained inferlility[J]. Hum Reprod, 2003,18(8) : 1588-1597.
  • 10Biljan MM, Tan SL, Tulandi T, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing the effects of 2.5 mg and 5. 0 mg of letrozole(LE) on follicular development, endometrial thickness and pregnangy rates in patients undergoing super-ovulation[J].Fertil Steril, 2002,76[3 Suppl 1] :S55.

共引文献95

同被引文献30

  • 1段金良,刘英,曾琼芳,蒋元华,黄雅丹.促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的3种用药方案在体外受精-胚胎移植中的有效性对比[J].实用妇产科杂志,2010,26(3):216-219. 被引量:5
  • 2Chuang M, Zapantis A, Taylor M, et al. Prolonged gonado- tropin stimulation is associated with decreased ART suc- cess [ J]. J Assist Reprod Genet ,2010,27:711-717.
  • 3Edwards RG, Lobo R, Bouchard P. Time to revolutionize o- varian stimulation[J]. Hum Reprod, 1996,11 ( 5 ) : 917- 919.
  • 4Tarlatzis BC, Bili HN. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone an- tagonists:impact of IVF practice and potential non-assis- ted reproductive technology applications [J].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2003,15 ( 3 ) :259-264.
  • 5Kiesel L, Runnebaum B. Gonadotrophin-releasing Hormone und Analoga-Physiologic and Pharmakologie [ J ]. Gynakol Geburtsh Rundsch, 1992,32:22-30.
  • 6Devroey P, Aboulghar M, Garcia-Velasco J, et al. Impro- ving the patient's experience of IVF/ICSI : a proposal for ah ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist co- treatment [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2009,24 (4) :764-774.
  • 7Olivennes F, Mannaerts B, Struijs M, et al. Perinatal out- come of pregnancy after GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) treatment during ovarian stimulation for conventional IVFor ICSI : a preliminary report [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2001,16 (8) :1588-1591.
  • 8Griesinger G, Felberbaum R, Diedrich K. GnRH antago- nists in ovarian stimulation:a treatment regimen of clini- cians'second choice? Data from the German national IVF registry [ J ]. Hum Seprod, 2005,20 (9) :2373-2375.
  • 9Fauser BC, Nargund G,Andersen AN, et al. Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later [J]. Hum Reprod, 2010,25 ( 11 ) :2678-2684.
  • 10Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, et al. Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH ag0nist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome trea- ted for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2010,25 ( 3 ) :683-689.

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部