期刊文献+

昆明小鼠旷场实验评价方法的三维结构 被引量:14

Open field test as a method for ethology in Kunming mice: three behavioral dimensions by factor analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨旷场实验(Open Field Test,OFT)作为昆明小鼠行为学评价方法的结构维度.方法成年雄性昆明小鼠放入旷场箱正中央格,摄像系统记录5 min的行为变化,实验间隔1周进行2次;采用因子分析进行分析评价,实验参数如下:中央区停留时间百分率( Ctime%)、中央区水平运动百分率( Ccross%)、水平运动(Cross)、垂直运动(Rear)和粪便粒数(FB).结果 Ctime%与Ccross% (P=0.756,P <0.001:Pearson=0.869,P<0.001)、Rear(P=0.694,P<0.01;Pearson=0.465,P<0.05)及Cross与Rear(P=0.599,P<0.01:Pearson =0.739,P<0.001)初测重测均具有较好组内相关性;Ctime% (P=0.586,P<0.01)、Ccross%(P=0.559,P<0.05)、Cross(P=0.633,P<0.01)、Rear(P=0.612,P<0.01)初测重测均具有较好相关性;OFT所有参数初测重测可提取三个公因子:Ctime%、Ccross%对焦虑因子F1贡献大(Loading%:43.34%,48.56%),Cross、Rear对运动探索因子F2贡献大(Loading%:27.94%,29.30%),FB对情绪因子F3贡献大(Loading%:21.95%,15.93%);F1、F2((P=0.567,P<0.01;Pearson =0.538,P<0.05)初测重测相关性亦较好.结论 OFT作为昆明小鼠行为学评价方法,具有三维结构:焦虑因子维度、OFT活性因子维度(运动探索因子)和情绪因子维度. Objective To explore the behavioral dimensions of the open field test ( OFF),as a method for ethology in Kunming mice.Methods The behavior of adult,male,Kunming mice in OFF was recorded twice,for five minutes,with a one-week inter-trial interval.The following parameters were evaluated by factor analysis:percentage of time exploring in the central area (Ctime%); percentage of squares crossing in the central area (Ccross%) ; total number of squares crossing in the whole apparatus(Cross) ; total number of rears in the whole apparatus(Rear) ; and number of fecal boli(FB).Results There were good intercorrelation and intracorrelation between test and retest for Ctime%,Ccross%,Cross and Rear.Ctime% and Ccross% had significant loadings on “Anxiety” factor ( Loading%:43.34%,48.56% ) ; Cross and Rear loaded on “locomotor-Exploration” factor ( Loading%:27.94%,29.30% ) ; and FB loaded on “Emotionality” factor ( Loading%:21.95%,15.93% ).A good correlation was found between test and retest for anxiety factor and locomtor-exploration factor.Conclusion Open field test,as a method for ethology in Kunming mice,comprise three behavioral dimensions:anxiety factor,OFF-activity factor(locomotor-exploration) and emotionality factor.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期875-877,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30930110,30973688)
关键词 旷场实验 昆明小鼠 状态焦虑 动物模型 结构维度 因子分析 相关性 Open field test Kunming mice State anxiety Animal model Structural dimensionFactor analysis Correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hall CS.Emotional behavior in the rat.I.Emotional behavior in the rat:defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality.J Comparative Psychol,1934,18:385-403.
  • 2Denenberg VH.Open-field behavior in the rat:What does it mean.?Ann N Y Acad Sci,1969,159:852-859.
  • 3孙世光,王婧婧,李自发,黄铭,刘健,魏盛,张惠云,乔明琦.旷场实验:昆明小鼠行为学评价方法的重测信度检验[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2010,19(12):1093-1095. 被引量:38
  • 4Walsh RN,Cummins RA.The open-field test:a critical review.Psychol Bull,1976,83:482-504.
  • 5Archer J.Tests for emotionality in rats and mice:a review.Anim Behay,1973,21:205-235.
  • 6Prut L,Belzung C.The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors:a review.Eur J Pharmacol,2003,463:3-33.
  • 7Jackson DL,Gillaspy JA.Purc-Stephenson R.Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis:An overview and some recommendations.Psychol Methods,2009,14:6-23.
  • 8Kaiser H.The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educ Psychol Meas,1960,20:141-151.
  • 9Cattell RB.The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behay Res,1966,1:245-276.
  • 10Whimbey AE,Denenberg VH.Two independent behavioral dimensions in open-field performance.J Comp Physiol Psychol,1967,63:500-504.

二级参考文献29

  • 1曾五一,黄炳艺.调查问卷的可信度和有效度分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005,20(6):11-15. 被引量:359
  • 2Schmidt MV,Muller MB.Animal models of anxiety.Drug Discov Today,2006,3:369-374.
  • 3Bourin M,Petit-Demoulière B,Nic Dhonnchadha B,et al.Animal models of anxiety in mice.Fundam Clin Pharmacol,2007,21:567-574.
  • 4Landgraf R.Animal models of anxiety.Stress,2003,6:73-75.
  • 5Prut L,Belzung C.The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors:a review.Eur J Pharmacol,2003,463:3-33.
  • 6Ramos A.Animal models of anxiety:do I need multiple tests? Trends Pharmacol Sci,2008,29:493-498.
  • 7Spitzer RL,Endicott J.Psychiatric rating scales// Sadock,BJ,Sadock,VA,Kaplan Sadock S.Pocket Handbook of Clinical Psychiatry 5th ed.New York:Lippincott Williams Wilkins,2010,29-34.
  • 8Berk RA.Generalizability of behavioral observations:a clarification of interobserver agreement and interobserver reliability.Am J Ment Defic,1979,83:460-472.
  • 9Watkins M,Pacheco M.Interobserver Agreement in Behavioral Research:Importance and Calculation.J Behav Educ,2000,10:205-212.
  • 10Clement Y,Le Guisquet AM,Venault P,et al.Pharmacological alterations of anxious behaviour in mice depending on both strain and the behavioural situation.PLoS ONE,2009,4:e7745.

共引文献41

同被引文献149

引证文献14

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部