期刊文献+

语言理解中记忆机制的研究进展 被引量:1

A Review of Studies on the Mechanism of Memory in Language Comprehension
原文传递
导出
摘要 相关的行为学实验,以及近年来较多采用的神经电生理学事件相关电位技术实验证明,记忆机制在语言理解中起着非常重要的作用。一方面,工作记忆为语言理解提供了可操作的平台,工作记忆容量的有限性也是语言理解策略形成的动因;另一方面,长时记忆则为语言理解提供了必要的信息后备支持。本文在论证语言理解与记忆机制关系的基础上,就语言理解中记忆机制的作用、性质、理论争议及相关实验证据等进行了总结和分析,并展望了进一步研究的方向。 The relative evidences from behavioral studies and electrophysiological studies have proved that the memory mechanism plays an important role in language comprehension.On one hand,working memory provides the operable platform for language comprehension,and the limited storage is the cause of comprehension strategies.On the other hand,long-term memory offers necessary backup-support for language comprehension.Based on the discussion upon the relationship between language comprehension and the memory mechanism,the paper retrospectively analyzes the effect mechanism of memory and the nature of the working memory system,summarizes the relative theories and the experimental evidences.In the end,the directions for future researches are put forward.
作者 赵鸣 刘涛
出处 《生物物理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期739-748,共10页 Acta Biophysica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(030900389) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金重点项目(09SJB740001) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金~~
关键词 语言理解 工作记忆 长时记忆 Language comprehension Working memory Long-term memory
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Baddeley AD.The episodic buffer:A new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci,2000,4(11):417-423.
  • 2Streb J,Hennighausen E,Rosler F.Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials.J Psycholinguist Res,2004,33(3):175-201.
  • 3Fiebach CJ,Schlesewsky M,Friederici AD.Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies:Insights from ERPs and fMRI.J Psycholinguist Res,2001,30(3):321-338.
  • 4Yang CL,Perfetti C,Liu Y.Sentence integration processes:An ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses.Brain Lang,2010,112(2):85-100.
  • 5Frazier L,Rayner K.Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension:Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentence.Cogn Psychol,1982,14(2):178-210.
  • 6张亚旭,蒋晓鸣,黄永静.言语工作记忆、句子理解与句法依存关系加工[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):22-28. 被引量:15
  • 7MacDonald MC,Just MA,Carpenter PA.Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.Cogn Psychol,1992,24(1):56-98.
  • 8Just MA,Carpenter PA.A capacity theory of comprehen- sion:Individual differences in working memory capacity.Psychol Rev,1992,99(1):122-149.
  • 9King J,Just MA.Individual differences in syntactic processing:The role of working memory.J Mem Lang,1991,30(5):580-602.
  • 10Nieuwland MS,Van Berkum J.Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution:Evidence from ERPs.Brain Lang,2006,1118(1):155-167.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Takazawa S, Takahashi N, Nakagome K, Kanno O, Hagiwara H, Nakajima H, Itoh K. Koshida I. Early components of event-related potentials related to semantic and syntactic processes in the Japanese language. Brain Topography, 2002, 14:169-177.
  • 2Haarmann H J, Cameron K A, Ruchkin D S. Short-term semantic retention during on-line sentence comprehension.Brain potential evidence from filler-gap constructions,Cognitive Brain Research, 2003, 15:178-190.
  • 3Haarmann H J, Cameron K A, Active maintenance of sentence meaning in working memory: evidence from EEG coherences, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2005, 57:115-128.
  • 4Kluender R, Kutas M, Bridging the gap: evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1993, 5:196-214.
  • 5Gunter T C, Jackson J L, Mulder G Language, memory and aging: an electrophysiological exploration of the N400 during reading of memory-demanding sentences.Psychophysiology, 1995, 32:215-229.
  • 6Bornkessel I D, Fiebach C J, Friederici A D. On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension:an individual differences approach. Cognitive Brai Research, 2004, 21:11-21.
  • 7Baddeley A D. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  • 8Baddeley A D, Della Sala S, Gray C, et al. Testing the central executive functioning with a pencil-and-paper test.In P. Rabbit (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 1997:61-80.
  • 9Smith E E, Jonides J. Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. PNAS, 1998, 95:12061-12068.
  • 10Just M A, Carpenter P A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory, Psychological Review, 1992, 99:122-149.

共引文献14

同被引文献21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部