期刊文献+

嗜酸乳杆菌的表面疏水性分析 被引量:8

Analysis of the surface hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus acidophilus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对嗜酸乳杆菌的表面疏水性进行分析。利用微生物粘着碳氢化合物法测定嗜酸乳杆菌的表面疏水率,通过采用不同环境条件和胰蛋白酶处理菌体细胞表面,初步确定嗜酸乳杆菌表面疏水性的影响因素。结果表明,影响菌体表面疏水性的因素有时间、温度、pH值、浓度、Ca2+和胰蛋白酶,菌体表面疏水性具有时间、温度、pH值和浓度依赖性,Ca2+和胰蛋白酶对其有一定作用,且表面疏水性与黏附能力之间存在着相关性;此外,推测能够介导嗜酸乳杆菌表面疏水性的某些物质可能是一类蛋白质。 We analyzed the surface hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus acidophilus. We utilized the method of microbial adhesion the hydrocarbons to determine the surface hydrophobic rate of Lactobacillus acidophilus and used the different environmental conditions and trypsin to process the cell to determine the influencing factors of the surface hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus acidophilus preliminary. Through this research, we ob- tained that the influencing factors of the surface hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus acidophilus were time, temperature, pH, concentration, Ca2+ and trypsin. Cell surface hydrophobicity had the dependent manner of time, temperature, pH and concentration, and was affected by the Ca2+ and trypsin, and was connected with the adhesion ability. In addition, we speculated that some substances which could mediate the hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus acidophilus may be a class of proteins.
出处 《中国乳品工业》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第10期8-11,共4页 China Dairy Industry
基金 陕西省"13115"项目(2009ZDKG-20) 陕西省教育厅项目(2010JK446)
关键词 嗜酸乳杆菌 疏水性 黏附 影响因素 LactobaciUus acidophilus hydrophobicity adhesion influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1COLLADO M C, MERILUOTO J, SALMINEN S. In Vitro Analysis of Probiotic Strain Combinations to Inhibit Pathogen Adhesion to Hu- man Intestinal Mucus [J]. Food Research International, 2007, 40: 629- 636.
  • 2BERNET M F, BRASSART D, NEESER J R, et al. Adhesion of Human Bifidobacterial Strains to Cultured Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Inhibition of Enteropathogen-Cell Interactions [J]. Apphed Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59(12): 412!-4128.
  • 3CANDELA M, PERNA F, CARNEVALI P, et al. Interaction of Pro- biotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Strains with Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells: Adhesion Properties, Competition against En- teropathogens and Modulation of IL-8 Production [J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2008, 125(3): 286-292.
  • 4PAN W H, LI P L, LIU Z. The Correlation between Surface Hy- drophobicity and Adherence of Bifidobacterium Strains from Cente- narians' Faeces[J]. Anaerobe, 2006, 12(3): 148-152.
  • 5CANZI E, GUGLIELMETTI S, MORA D, et al. Conditions Affect- ing Cell Surface Properties of Human Intestinal Bifidobacteria [J]. An- tonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2005, 88(3-4): 207-219.
  • 6林雪彦,牛钟相.乳酸杆菌高黏附性的适宜条件研究[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2005,25(12):1022-1022. 被引量:4
  • 7王丽群,张佰荣,王彦,尚玉琳,孟祥晨.双歧杆菌体外对Caco-2的黏附及其表面性质分析[J].微生物学报,2010,50(5):606-613. 被引量:11
  • 8陈军,常山,张雅萍,肖光夏.双歧杆菌粘附大鼠肠上皮细胞相关因素的研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2002,24(2):138-141. 被引量:15
  • 9KOS B, SUSKOVIC J, VUKOVIC S, et al. Adhesion and Aggregation Ability of Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92 [J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2003, 94(6): 981-987.
  • 10FRECE J, KOS B, SVETEC L K, et al. Importance of S-layer Pro- teins in Probiotic Activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus M92[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2005, 98(2): 285-292.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S. In vitro analysis of probiotic strain combinations to inhibit pathogen adhesion to human intestinal mucus. Food Research International, 2007, 40: 629-636.
  • 2Bernet MF, Brassart D, Neeser JR, Servin AL. Adhesion of human bifidobacterial strains to cultured human intestinal epithelial ceils and inhibition of enteropathogen-cell interactions. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59(12) : 4121-4128.
  • 3Candela M, Perna F, Carnevali P, Vitali B, Ciati R, Gionchetti P, Rizzello, Campieri, Brigidi P. Interaction of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with human intestinal epithelial cells: adhesion properties, competition against enteropathogens and modulation of IL-8 production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2008, 125: 286-292.
  • 4Kos B, Suskovic J, Vukovic S, . Simpraga M, Frece J, Matosic. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2003, 94(6): 981-987.
  • 5Mobili P, Serradell MA., Trejo SA, Puigvert FA, Abraham AG, Antoni GL. Heterogeneity of S-layer proteins from aggregating and non-aggregating Lactobacillus kefir strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2009, 95(4) : 363-372.
  • 6Crociani J, Grill JP, Huppert M, Ballongue J. Adhesion of different bifidobacteria strains to human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells and comparison with in vivo study. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1995, 21 (3) : 146-148.
  • 7Del RB, Sgorbati B, Miglioli M, Palenzona D. Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2000, 31 (6) : 438-442.
  • 8Palencia PF, Lopez P, Corbi AL, Pelaez C, Requena T. Probiotic strains : survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions, in vitro adhesion to Caco-2 cells and effect on cytokine secretion. European Food Research Technology, 2008, 227: 1475-1484.
  • 9Buck BL, Altermann E, Svingerud T, Klaenhammer R.Functional analysis of putative adhesion factors in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71 (12) : 8344-8351.
  • 10Pan WH, Li PL, Liu Z. The correlation between surface hydrophobicity and adherence of Bifidobacterium strains from centenarians'faeces. Anaerobe, 2006, 12 (3) : 148- 152.

共引文献24

同被引文献108

引证文献8

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部