期刊文献+

认知控制模式下的CREAM方法概率量化

Quantification of human error probability of CREAM in cognitive control mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了人因可靠性分析(Human Reliability Analysis,HRA)中人为差错概率的量化。首先,介绍了认知可靠性与差错分析方法(Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method,CREAM)中基本法的基本理论,讨论了两种概率化认知控制模式的确定方法——贝叶斯网络法和模糊逻辑法,强调了概率化认知控制模式下量化人为差错概率的必要性。然后,在分析认知模式下人为差错概率分布的基础上,通过理论推导,构建了概率化认知控制模式下人为差错概率的量化方法。为了提高计算效率,提供了人为差错概率的蒙特卡洛仿真算法。最后,通过实例,演示了方法的使用过程,并证明了方法的有效性。 Human errors have nowadays turned to be tile main factor that may reduce the reliability and safety of human-machine system, and therefore necessary to be attached special attention to. It is for this reason that the quantification of human error probability has be- come the research topic of this paper known as a key ingredient of hu- man reliability analysis (HRA). However, the first step for us to do here is to introduce the basic method of cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) as a kind of widely accepted HRA method as well as the basic theory it involves. And, then, we would like to introduce the steps for quantifying human error probability in details. Considering that cognitive behavior mode provided by CREAM should be continuous, we have put forward two methods for defining the probabilistic control modes by HRA practitioners, which are based on Bayesian nets and the fuzzy logic, respectively. The reason for so do- ing is that if the human error probability were not to be quantified, it would be necessary to construct a method to deal with the human error probability in probabilistic mode, which makes it necessary to apply a method for quantifying the human error probability in probabilistic control modes. In preparing for such a method, we should take the lognormal function as the probabilistic density function of human error probability in the mode and the probabilistic density function of hu- man error probability in probabilistic cognitive behavior mode as the linear combination of the functions in each cognitive behavior mode. However, the human error probability in prebabilistic mode is quanti- fied through theoretical inference. In order to heighten the efficiency of calculation, we have also applied the Monte Carlo algorithm to our work. And, last of all, the validity of the method has been demon- strated by means of a sample study to show the process of the method.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期206-209,共4页 Journal of Safety and Environment
关键词 安全工程 人因可靠性分析 人为差错概率 认知可靠性与差错分析方法 认知控制模式 蒙特卡洛仿真 safety engineering human reliability analysis human error probability cognitive reliability and error analysis method cognitive control mode Monte Carlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1HOLLNAGEL E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM)[M]. London: Elsevier Science Ltd., 1998.
  • 2SPURGIN A J. Human reliability assessment theory and practice[M]. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2010.
  • 3孙志强,谢红卫,李欣欣,史秀建.CREAM方法中控制模式分类的模糊方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(5):21-26. 被引量:12
  • 4陈清亮,陈磊,汤东林.稀土复合稳定剂在PVC型材挤出中析出问题的研究[J].新型建筑材料,2003,30(2):51-52. 被引量:6
  • 5HE Xuhong(何旭洪), HUANG Xiangrui(黄祥瑞). Human reliability analysis in industrial system: principles, methods and applications(工业系统中人的可靠性分析: 原理、方法与应用)[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2007.
  • 6SWAIN A D, GUTTMANN H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278 . Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.
  • 7GERTMAN D I, BLACKMAN H S, HANEY L N. INTENT: a method for estimating human error probabilities for decision-based errors[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1992, 35(2): 127-136.
  • 8刘维平,曹伟国,杨立强,金丽亚.装甲装备中人的可靠性统计与分析[J].兵工学报,2007,28(1):83-86. 被引量:3

二级参考文献12

  • 1何旭洪,童节娟,黄祥瑞.低功率和停堆工况下人员可靠性分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(4):93-96. 被引量:4
  • 2Erik HoUnagel. The phenotype of erroneous actions[J]. Int J Man-machine Studies, 1993, 39:1 - 32.
  • 3Hollnagel E.Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method[M].Oxford (UK):Elsevier Science Ltd.,1998.
  • 4Fujita Y,Hollnagel E.Failures without errors:qualification of context in HRA[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2004,83:145-151.
  • 5Spurgin A J.Critique of current human reliability analysis methods[A].IEEE 7th Human Factors Meeting[C],2002.3:3.12 -3.18.
  • 6Trucco P,Leva M C,A probabilistic cognitive simulator for HRA studies (PROCOS)[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92:1 117-1 130.
  • 7Konstandinidou M.,Nivolianitou Z.,Kiranoudis C.et al,A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2006,91:706 -716.
  • 8Kim M.C.,Seong P.H.,Hollnagel E.,A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2006,91:191-199.
  • 9Zadeh L.A.The concept of a linguistic variable and Its application to approximate reasoning[M].Elsevier,1975.
  • 10ROSA L.V.,Human reliability analysis in the performance of advanced cardiac life support tasks[D].Master Thesis,University of Texas,2003.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部