期刊文献+

语文课程理念的传播和理解——感知课程视角的分析 被引量:2

The Disseminating and Understanding of Chinese Curriculum Conceptions from the Perspective of Perceived Curriculum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过揭示语文课程改革中三个主要的课程感知群体——教科书编写者、培训者和教师对语文课程理念的理解特征,描述课程理念在传播过程中经历的改变的异同,采用量化和质化方法,搜集结构性访谈和调查问卷等数据进行分析。结果发现,编写者对课程理念持批判性认同,培训者和教师则体现为表面上的赞同。"三维目标融合"理念,培训者和教师对三个维度的看法各有偏重。"自主合作探究的学习方式"理念,编写者、培训者和教师都认为"自主"是基础。认为"综合性学习"概念较笼统。课程理念的表述方式、感知者的个人因素(身份、年龄等)、地区差异、考试或评价方式等都对课程感知产生影响。为搞好语文课程改革,应厘清课程理念所使用的概念之间的界限,加强课程培训。 This study reveals the characteristics of the understanding of Chinese curriculum conceptions in three main groups in Chinese curriculum reform, namely, the textbook writers, the teacher trainers and the teachers and depicts the similarities and differences in the changes that occurred in the dissemination of the curriculum conceptions. Qualitative and quantitative research methods were adopted in the study. The analysis of the data collected through structured interview and questionnaires show that textbook writers critically agreed with the conceptions, while the teacher trainers and teachers only partially agreed with the conceptions. As for the conception "integration of the three-dimension targets", teacher trainers and teachers inclined to emphasize different dimension of the conception. As for the conception "independent, collaborative and exploratory learning", all the three groups considered "independent learning" as the foundation. The conception of "integrative learning'" was thought to be a general and ambiguous description. The factors influencing the perceived curriculum include the expression patterns of the conceptions, personal factors (such as age, status etc. ), regional differences, and the test or assessment methods and so on. The boundaries between the concepts used in curriculum conceptions should be clarified and curriculum training should be intensified in order to implement the Chinese curriculum reform effectively.
作者 刘彩祥
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期76-84,共9页 Journal of Educational Studies
关键词 课程 语文课程标准 感知课程 课程理念 语文教科书 Chinese curriculum Chinese curriculum standard perceived curriculum dissemination of the curriculum conceptions Chinese textbook
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1黄政杰.课程改革新论:教育现场虚实探究[M].台北:冠学文化,2005.
  • 2Goodlad, J. I. , Klein, F. M & Tye, K. A. The domains of curriculum and their study[M]. Goodlad, J. I. and associations (Eds.). Curriculum Inquiry: the Study o1 Curriculum Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1979.
  • 3王全兴.九年一贯课程改革实施成效之研究.教育资料与研究,2010,92(2):75-110.
  • 4陈晓波.变革实施中高中语文教师的课程取向及影响因素:A市的个案研究[D].香港:香港中文大学,2009:16.
  • 5石中英.教育学原理[EB/OL].下载于2010年10月9日:http://source.mastvu.ah.cn/gaoxiao/ku/bjsfdx/jyxyl/content/ppt/02141.ppt.2009:13.
  • 6杜静.领悟课程:教师与课程关系的重构[J].河南社会科学,2007,15(2):141-143. 被引量:7
  • 7夏永庚.理解课程的生成性[J].上海教育科研,2006(6):59-61. 被引量:4
  • 8吴茂源,黄显华.从课程设计角度剖析中学中文科教师对新修订中学中国语文课程的意见(学校教育改革系列之39)[M].香港:香港中文大学教育学院,香港教育研究所,2006:2.
  • 9黄光雄,蔡清田.课程设计:理论与实际[M].台北:五南图书公司,2004.
  • 10赖志峰.课程连结理论之探究-课程标准、教学与评量之关系.教育研究集刊,2004,50(1):63-90.

二级参考文献50

  • 1张华.论课程实施的涵义与基本取向[J].全球教育展望,1999,29(2):28-33. 被引量:72
  • 2施良方.西方课程探究范式探析[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),1994,12(3):27-33. 被引量:32
  • 3姜勇.论教师专业发展的后现代转向[J].比较教育研究,2005,26(5):67-70. 被引量:76
  • 4[1]郝德永.课程研究方法论[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2001.
  • 5[7]李子建、黄显华.课程:范式、取向与设计[M].香港:中文大学出版社,1996.
  • 6李子建.从批判角度剖析课程定义[J].教育学报,1996,(1).
  • 7[18][美]拉尔夫@泰勒著,施良方译.课程与教学的基本原理[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1994.
  • 8[20][德]遭格拉斯@凯尔纳、斯蒂文@贝斯特著,张志斌译.后现代理论--批判性的质疑[M].北京;中央编译出版社,1999.
  • 9[21][美]大卫@雷@格里芬著,马季方译.后现代科学--科学魅力的再现[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
  • 10[22]让-弗朗索瓦@利奥塔尔著,车槿山译.后现代状态:关于知识的报告[M].北京:生活@读书@新知三联书店,1997.

共引文献80

同被引文献50

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部